The court granted permission to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition filed under Article 226 and Section 151 CPC, which challenged illegal constructions and development permissions. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
Writ petition (WP No. 26342 of 2023) dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I3166l
rN rHE HIGH.orTrt8JtotllBlttEoF.TELANGANA
(Speciai'OiiginalJ urisdiction)
FRIDAY,THETWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER ' '''-"iwo rHousnNo AND TWENW rHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE T'VINOD KUMAR
WRIT PETITIONNOi263420F2023
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article226 of the constitutionof lndia praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavitfiledtherewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction,mon: particularly onein the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaringthat the action ol the respondents2 to 5, to take appropriate steps for removethe illegal constructions madeby the third parties, by cancelling thepermissionsif any granted in favorrof the third partiesin respectof the land to an Ac. 5.07guntas in Sy. No. 111 situatedat Madinaguda Village' Serilingampally Mandal,Rangareddy District,as illegal, improper,arbitrary, unjust, contrary to law, violative ofprinciples of naturaljustice, violative of Article 14'21 and 300-4 of Constitution oflndia and uncorrstitutional,till the claimsof the petitioners are settled, in respect of the said land
///
IA NO: 10F 2023
Petitionunder Sect'on151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affrdavitfiled in supportof the petition' the HighCourt maybe pleasedbe direct therespondents2 to 5, to takeappropriatesteps for removethe illegal constructionsmadeby the third parties' by cancellingthe permissions if any granted in favourof the third parties in respect of the land to an Ac' 5'07 guntas in Sy. No.111, situatedat MadinagudaVillage, Serilingampally Mandal, Rangareddy District,pending disposal of the above Writ Petition'
Counselfor the Petitioner : SRI CHATLA MADHU for SRI GUNTHASURESH Counselfor the Respondent No'1 : GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBANDEV
Counselfor the RespondentNo'2TOS : SRIM'A'K'MUKHEEO'SC FOR GHMC The Courtmadethe following: ORDER
l I i
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR tr/RIT PETITION No.263 42 0F 2o23
OR.DER
Sri Chatla Madhu, learned c()unsel representing Sri Guntha Suresh, learned Counsel fc,r the petitioner seeks permtssion of thc Court to wr r hd rau. t he Writ petition
Granting permission as sought Lhe Writ petition is dismissed as wr thdran,n No rtrr.ler as tO ( OSts
Miscellaneous perir ions, ii ;rny, pending in this Writ
Petition, shall stancl closecl.
SD/.P.CH. NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANT REGISIRAR
//TRUE COPY// sEcfloN #flcen
To,
1 2.. TwoOne CCsCC to SRI GUNTHA SURESH, Advocatr:. to GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN [tEV,[OPUC] High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies. BSK SB \
HIGH COURT
DATED:2210912023
ORDER
WP.No.26342of 2023
,..,,:)i..r'i-
,;l
,,- i
lic
,...". 1l fliJ 2[?3
DISMISSINGTHE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
"-.0
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant permission to withdraw the writ petition under Section 151 CPC regarding illegal constructions and development permissions.
Whether to maintain any order on the writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sri Guntha Suresh
State of Telangana
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
Deputy Commissioner
Town Planning Officer
T. Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
