Disposed

Pilli Ramulamma v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC23 Sept 2023WP/26502/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition under Article 226 and Section 151 CPC, the High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's application for an electricity connection within four weeks and communicate the decision, disposing of the matter based on a prior order.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondents to consider the application dated 09.06.2023, provide power supply or pass appropriate orders, and communicate the decision within four weeks.

Pilli Ramulamma Vs The State of Telangana — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[3303 ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

SATURDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE J SREENIVAS RAO

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 26502 OF 2023

¶8

Between:

¶9

R/o.H.No.B-3-231/C/1Pilli Ramulamma, W^/oL 9,Sate Sri ri Krishna Nagar, Yousufguda, Yadaiah, aged about Hyderabad53^years, Occ. Housewife,

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Power and Energy Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶13

Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd., of Telangana,^{rep. by its} Chairman and Managing Director, Mint Compound, Hyderabad.

¶14

Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd., of Telangana, rep. by its Superintending Engineer (operation) Cybercity, Hyderabad.

¶15

Southem Power Distribution Company Ltd., of Telangana, rep. by its Asst. Divisional Engineer (Operational) Chanda Nagar, Hyderabld_.,a=rrO*O="r,

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia^praying thatⁱⁿ the circumstances stated in the affidavit . filed therewith, the High Court^may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the Respondents in not^processing the applications for release of electricity connections to^{the petitioner'sbuilding} premises bearing Plot No.174, H.No.4-998, admeasuring 150 sq yards in sy.No.80, Situated at Marthanda Nagar, New Hafezpet, Serilingampally^Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, now Medchal-Malkajgiri District as illegal, arbitrary,^unjust and consequently direct the respondents to^process applications for^providing electricity connections and to release service connections^with meters^{without any} further delay

¶17

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶18

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be^pleased to^direct the 3'd Respondent to^process applications for^providing electricity connections

¶19

7 T

¶20

and to release service connections^.with meters to the^{petitioner's building} premises bearing Plot No.'1 74, H.No.4-998, admeasuring^'l 50 sq^yardsin sy.No.80, Situated at Marthanda Nagar, New Hafezpet, Serilingampally^tt/andal, Ranga Reddy District, now Medchal-Malkajgiri District

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI L.VISHNU PRASAD

¶22

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR ENERGY

¶23

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 : SRI R.VINOD REDDY, SC FOR TSSPDCL

¶24

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶25

¶26

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO

¶27

WRIT PETITIONNo.26502 of2023

¶28

ORDER:

¶29

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Government Pleader for energy, appearing on behalf of respondent No.1 and Sri R.Vinod Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for TSSPDCL appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 4.

¶30

The petitioner approached the Court seeking the prayer as follows:

¶31

"To issue an appropriate Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the Respondents in not processing the applications for release of electricity connections to the petitioner,s building premises bearing plot No.174, H.No.4998, admeasuring 150 sq yards in Sy.No.gO, Situated at Marthanda Nagar. New Hafeezpet, Serilingampally t4andal, Ranga Reddy District, now Medcha l-Ma lkajgiri District, as illegal, arbitrary lnjust^and consequently direct the respondents to process applications for providing electricity connections and to release service connections with meters without any further delay and to pass such other or orders as this Hon,ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.,,

I I

3, It is represented by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner; learned Government Pleader and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents that the present writ petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court dated 28.O4.2023passed in W.P.No.12705 of 2023, hence, the writ petition could be disposed of in terms of the order of this Court dated28.04.2023 passed in W.P.No.12705 of 2023.

¶36

4, Bringing the said submission of both the learned counsel on record, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's application dated 09.06.2023 as per law, provide power supply or pass appropriate orders on the application filed by the petitioner and communicate the decision to the petitioner, within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. However. there shall be no order as to costs.

¶37

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ

¶38

Petition, shall stand closed.

¶39

sD/'N?lttD#ili'#BtE[iR/ //TRUE coPY// qD

SECTION^OFFICER

The Principal^{SecretarhPower and Energy Department' Secretariat' State of}

¶44

+nsTahr''{**',",'"1iHilmiil#ili,'jj.i}'.:il::I";'" Ltd.. of Telangana,^{IVIint Col}

¶45

The SuPerintending^tnglne'

¶46

The SuPerintending^tnglne' Compahy^{Ltd., of Telangani}

¶47

The Asst. Divisional Company^{Ltd., of Telangana' EngtneL';nanoar\agdr'I rvu'rquc}

¶48

¶49

I 9ne^{CC to Sri L.Vishnu prasad,} Advocate IOPUCI 6. Two CCs to Gp for Energy, High Court foi f# Saaie of Tetangana at Hyderabad [OUTI

¶50

9ne 9ne^{CC to Sri R.Vinod Reddy,} SC for TSSpDCL tOpUCI 8. Two CD Two CD CD Copies

¶51

9ne 9ne 8. Two CD Two CD CD Copies

¶52

Kj. LS ,/

HIGH COURT

DArED:2310912023

,
rrtl1S I
\ <br>v

ORDER

WP.No.26502 ol 2023

DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS.

Pilli Ramulamma v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pilli Ramulamma v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Syed Ali, Vs Sri Prasada Rao

Pidugu Sudhakar Vs The State of Telanagana

T. Balaiah, Vs Telangana State Road Transport Corporation

Sanda Balu Vs The State of Telangana

Tangirala Shankari Vs The State of Telangana

Vijaya Bhanu Bondada Vs The State of Telangana