Court dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear despite assurances and multiple adjournments.
None. The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33oo ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OFTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW THREE
l PRESENT I
THE HONOuRABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA li,t; WR lT PETITION NO: 10506 OF m14 tl i I Between:
Khubchand Roopani, I S/o. MeharchandRoopani,, Aged about 51 )4ears, Occ Business, Ryo.H.Nd.8-3-382 to 384,Ameerpet, Yellareddyguda,Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitutionof lndiaprayingthat in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filedtherewith,the High Court maybe pleased to issue a writ, order or direction moreparticularlyone in the natureof Mandamus, declaring the inaction ofthe respondents 1 an 2 in not consideringthe representations of thepetitioner dated-11.12-2013and 05.02.2014and consequenuy direct the respondents 1and 2to disconnect the Electricity connection service Number'10755released in favour of 3rcl respondent for Plot No.3 Land admeasuring 503Sq- Yardsin Sy. No-'I26 situatedat Hydernagar Village, Balanagar Mandal,Ranga Reddy District belongs to the petitioner.
rl
1
I l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 13'195 OF 2014)
Petition under Sbction 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in Support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondentsi 1 and 2 to disconnect the Electricity Connection Service Number 10755 released in favour of 3rd respondent for Plot No.3 Land admeasuring 503 Sq.r Yards in Sy. No.126 situated at Hydernagar Village, Balanagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District belongs to the petitioner, pending disposal of the Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitionar: SR! M. HAMSA RAJ
Counsel forthe Respdndent Nos. 1 & 2: SRI R. VINOD REDDY, SC FOR TSTRANSCO
ll I Counsel for the Respdnbent Nos.3 to 5: SRI VENKATA RANGADAS KANURI
I i
The Court made the following: ORDER
(
HON'BLE SRI WSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAI{A
WRIT PDTITION NO.10506 of2Ol4
ORDER:
This court inspite of granting several adjournments, petitioner did not choose to prosecute his case.
On O9.11.2023, this matter was directed to be posted under the caption "for dismissal" on 14.11.2023. Today also, when the matter is called, none appeErrs for the petitioner.
Hence, the writ perition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shalr be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ petition, shall stand closed.
SD/-MOHD. ISMAIL ASSTSTANT REGISTIAR //TRUE COPY// lvl--- SECTION OFFICER
ro, ii
'1. One CC to SRI M. HAMSA RAJ, Advocate [OPUCI
/
g
t iI l
t
HIGH COURT II
DATED:1411112023
r
(
I
ORDER
WP.No.10506 of 2014
srATE eA
a
u
f,
11 stt $8 rtb
,o
+
* tlEsPr-il
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
@c.Pt8
ra\al
Khubchand Roopani
Andhra Pradesh Central Power Distribution Company Limited
Sri Justice Nagesh Bheemapaka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
