The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 25721 of 2015 as infructuous on the submission that the cause did not survive for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENryTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVASRAO
WRIT PETITION NO:25721 OF 2015
Between:
Jadi Vaishali, W/o Jadi Prasad, aged39 years,Oc .P.Shop Dealer, Rl/o dDistrict. Edavelli village, Khairgaon, RebbenaMandal, AdilabacF
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitutionof lndia praying that in the circumstances slated in the affidavit filedtherewith,the High Courtmay be pleased to issue pass an order or writparticularly onein thenature of the writ of Mandamus declaring the order dated 07-08-2015.in R.C. No. Bl234l2O'15-2 of the 3rd respondent is illegal, arbitrary, ingross violation of principlesof natural lusticeand contraryto the guidelinesfor selectionand appointmentof Fair Price Shop Dealers under A.P.StatePublicDistribution System (Control) Order, 2008 and consequently set aside the order dated07-08-2015in RC No. 8123412015-2 of the 3rd respondent.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WP MP. NO: 33382 OF2015)
Petition under Section15 t CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the HighCourt may be pleasedto suspend the order dated 07-08-2015 inRC.No.B/234l2015-2of the 3rd respondent, pending disposal of the writpetition.
Counsel for the Petitioner:M/s. P.LAKSHMAREDDY Counsel for the Respondents:GPFORCIVIL SUPPLIES
The Court made the following:ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SR,EEN[/AS RAO
uIRIT PETITION No.2572l of 2Ol5
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the
cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication.
2- Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition
is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand
closed.
\
To,
SD/.MOHD.SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSISTAryI REGISTRAR /ffRUE COPY/' q SECTION OFFICER
BSR
BS
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0911112023
ORDER
WP.No.25721 of 2015
1t{ ESTA r€'
(
q
vz
oO 2 ir N[\l 2123
{)i:sr'/\rc
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
AS INFRUGTUOUS,
WITHOUT COSTS
@
1"/aL''
?<br>
Jadi Vaishali
The State of Telangana
J. Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
