Smt. Nenavath Kishti v. The State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
The Single Judge closed the writ petition challenging the non-payment of compensation for land acquired under the AP LRAR Act, 2013, noting that the notifications had lapsed and the acquisition process required a fresh proposal awaiting approval, rendering the cause of action non-subsisting.
What did the court decide?
Writ Petition closed; No order as to costs.
What the court decided
[32s6 ]
I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 24515 OF 2023
Between:
- Smt. Nenavath Kishti, Wo N Lakya Naik Age. 68 years, Occ.Farmer, H.No.C-39, manjya thanda Gazinagar, Konda Mallepally Mandal, Nalgonda District.
- Nenavath Amar Singh, S/o N Ram Singh Age. 40 years, Occ. Farmer, Manjya thanda, Gazinagar, Konda lrlallepally [,{andal, Nalgonda District.
- Nenavath Hanmanthu, S/o N Kota Age. 4'1 years, Occ-Farmer, Chinta Chettu thanda, Gazinagar, Konda Mallepally Mandal, Nalgonda District.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking declaration against non-payment of compensation and consequential relief survives when the notifications have lapsed and no award has been passed.
Whether the High Court should close the writ petition when the acquisition process requires a fresh requisition proposal awaiting approval.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nenavath Kishti and others
- respondent
The State of Telangana
Coram
Mummineni Sudheer Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/24515/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court