Dismissed

Kurugoru Parijatha v. The State of Telangan

Telangana HC22 Dec 2023WP/24504/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226, the petitioner, claiming ownership of agricultural land recorded incorrectly as house sites in the Dharani portal, sought rectification. The single judge, without examining merits, directed respondents to process the application with public notice.

What did the court decide?

Directing respondents to consider petitioner's Dharani application No.2300057633 after issuing notice to interested persons and passing orders within 2 months.

Kurugoru Parijatha Vs The State of Telangan — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³¹⁸³ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original J urisdiction)

¶3

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 24504 OF 2023

¶7

Between:

¶8

Kurugoru Parijatha, Wo. Kurugoru Vijay Kumar, Aged about 49 years. Occ House wife, R/o.^'l-146, Nehru Ganj, Makthal Mandal, Narayanpet District

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary (Revenue), Secretariat, Hyderabad, T.S

¶12

2 The District Collector, Collectorate Complex, Narayanpet.

¶13

3 The Revenue Divisional Officer, At Narayanapet, Telangana - 50921 0

¶14

The Tahsildar, Dhanwada Mandal, Yamnanpally Village, Narayanpet, Telangana -509208

¶15

Mandal Parishad Development Office (MPDO), Dhanwada, Telangana 509205

¶16

...RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respqndent Nos.¹ to 5 in not rectifying the revenue entries in the Dharani Portal even after submitting objection letter and application for rectification of errors in recording the^{land in} Sy.No. 89 as house sites and consequently direct the Respondent Nos.¹ to^{5 to} record the name of the Petitioner in the Dharani as the Pattadar for the^{land in} Sy.No. 89 Ac.2.26^gts., situated at Yamnanpally village,^{DhanwadaMandal,} Narayanpet District.

¶18

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶19

Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.1 to 5 to dispose of the petitioner's application No. 2300057633 by providing a hearing opportunity to the petitioner.

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI H.RAJESH KUMAR

¶21

Counsel for the Respondents: AGp FOR REVENUE

¶22

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶23

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{B. VIJAYSEN REDDY}

¶24

WRIT PETITION No.24504 OF²⁰²³

¶25

ORDER:(ORAL)

¶26

This writ petition is filed aggrieved^{by the inaction of the} respondents in considering^{petitioner's Dharaniapplication} No.2300057633 dated 26.03.2023 for^{rectihcation of revenue} entries (Dharani portal) in respect^{her landadmeasuring Acs-2-26} guntas in Survey No.89 situatcd a1^{Yamnanpally Vittage,} Dhanwada Mandal, Narayanapet^District.

¶27

Heard learned counsel for the^{petitionerand learned} Assistant Government Pleader^{for Revenuc appearingfor the} respondents, and perused the^{material on record}

¶28

Petitioner claims to be^{owner and possessorof the land} admeasuring Acs.3-02^guntas in^{Survcy No.89 siluatedat} Yamnanpally Village,^{Dhanwada Mandal, NarayanapetDistrict'} Originally, Mr. Baslingappa,^{father of the petitionerwas the owner} of the subject land. After^{his death,petitionersucceededto the} subject tand. On submission^{of her application for mutation, the} Mandal Revenue Inspector^{has conducted detailedenquiryand} / --.1 I i

!--r\ **r..".+m{

\ .:r

submitted his report on 15.l.2021 to^{respondentNo.4}

¶33

Subsequent to the enquiry, the^{petitionerwas issuedsuccession} proceedings in respect of the subject land in her favour. She^was also issued e-pattadar passbook No.T01070080477^{with Khata} No.60264. Petitioner sold an extent of land to third^partiesand currently she is in possession of Acs.2-26 guntas.

¶34

It is stated that in the Dharani portal, the subject land^is recorded as House sites by sub-dividing the Survey Nos.8l/l/l/l/l/2 (Ac.0-08 guntas), 89lllllll2^{(Ac.0-02 guntas),} 891112 (Ac.0-02 guntas), 89/2 (Ac.0-02 guntas) and 89lllllllll1 (Acs.2-26 guntas) total admeasuring Acs.3-02 guntas. On getting to know about the same, the petitioner has submitted a letter dated 30.01.2023 to respondent No.2 for rectification of the entries in Dharani portal. Than on being advised, the petitioner has also submitted Dharani application bearing No.2300056733 dated 26.03.2023 for rectification of revenue entries in respect of the subject land. However, there is delay on the part of respondent authorities in processing the Dharani application of the petitioner, as such, she is constrained to approach this Court.

¶35

)

¶36

"/'

¶37

Leamed Assistant Government Pleader tbr Revenue submitted that appropriate action will be taken on the Dharani application of the petitioner, in accordance with law.

¶38

Recording the aforesaid submission of leamed^Assistant Govemment Pleader for Revenue,^{without going into the merits of} the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing^{respondents No.2} to 4 to consider the petitioner's Dharani^application No.2300057633 dated 26.03.2023 tbr^{rectification of revenue} entries (Dharani portal) in respect her^{land admeasuringAcs.2-26} guntas 1n Survey No.89 situated ar Yamnanpally^Village, Dhanwada Mandal, Narayanapet^{District, by issuing notice to all} concemed/interested persons, and^{pass orders, in accordancewith} taw, within a period of two⁽²⁾ months^{from the date of receipt of} a copy of this order. No order^as to costs

¶39

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous^{applications,}

¶40

if any, pending in the writ^{petitionstand closed}

¶41

SD/- V.KAVITHA ASSISTANT^REGIs/tRAR //TRUE^COPY// sEcrloN Y#t'"t*

¶42

To,

¶43

(Revenue),^{Secretariat, Hyderabad' State of}

¶44

1. The^{PrinciPal Secretary} Telangana.

¶45

The^{District Collector, CollectorateComplex' Narayanpet'}

¶46

The^{Revenue Divisional Officer' At Narayanapet' Telangana - 50921 0}

¶47

l' Yamnanpally

¶48

1. Telangana The Tahsildar. -so9206 Dhanwa^Na da Manda l, yamnanpally Village, N arayanpet,arayanpet, '/

¶49

TherMandal parishad Development Officer (MpDO), Dhanwada, Telangana

¶50

One CC to SRt H.RAJESH KUMAR, Advocate IOPUCI

¶51

7 Iffi":r3:J?"",IntoR REVENUE, Hish court ror the State or reransana at

¶52

B Two CD Copies BSR -A-,GJ

HIGH COURT

DATED: 2211212023

ORDER

WP.No.24504 of 2023

1 r{6 s 7AIc.
(
q
o 10 J AIl 202{ o
t
t
Es p A I

¶61

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS

¶62

\r \o

Kurugoru Parijatha v. The State of Telangan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kurugoru Parijatha v. The State of Telangan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dappu Radhika Vs The State of Telangana

Narla Ramchander Vs The State of Telangana

Smt Manuka Mallamma Vs The State of Telangana

Sri Yadla Satish Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Kunja Kannappa and 26 others Vs The State of Telangana and 11 others

Smt Kadakanchi Chinna Somakka Vs The State of Telangana