Disposed

K. Ushasree v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC24 Aug 2023WP/23409/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, Special Original Jurisdiction disposed of a writ petition under Article 226 without orders, observing the matter was squarely covered by a prior order dated 09.06.2023 in WP No. 14322 of 2023 regarding power supply to a building.

What the court decided

AI extract

K. Ushasree Vs The State of Telangana — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³³⁰³ I

¶2

HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY, THE^{TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST} TWO THOUSAND^{ANDTWENTY THREE}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO}

¶6

WRIT PET^{ITION NO:23409oF 2023}

¶7

Between:

¶8

K. Ushasree,^{Wo Kiran Grandhi,aged about 49 years, occ ; Doctor, .R/oVilla} ii" Io6, arr*ir,i'n-r-,^{rtrrisonl oooirpZttv vitl"ge, Me6chal-Malkajgiri District'}

¶9

.....PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The State of^{Telangana,Rep.by its Prhcip^a^lSecretary' Power and Energy} Oepartment, Secrelariat,^{Hyderabad-500022'}

¶12

2 SouthernPowerDistributionCompanyLtd,ofTelangana'Repbyits il;ffi ;;' ;il1;;;s;s^{Director,Mintcompound' Hvderabad'}

¶13

3 SouthernPowerDistributionCompanyLtd',ofTelangana'Rep'byThe ffiH;Hffi;'e-ndit'eer.^{(operatibn),'Medchalcircle' Medchal'}

¶14

4 Greater Hyderabad^{Municipal Corporation,Rep' by its Commissioner'} Tankbund, Hyderabad.

¶15

.....RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition Under^{Article 226 ol lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the} circumstances^{stated in in"-atfiaa'it filed therewith'the High Court.maybe} Wiit, ota"'.or.^{direction more particularly onein} pleased to issue "n "pprop,i,G the nature of^{Writ of rrr"ni"rri deciaringthe action of the Respondentsin not} i"i.rs.glnl^{po*", ,rpptfiotn" eltition6'.lbuildingat premisesbeanng.P.art of} Plot No.8^{(Western parti,-aimeasuring620 sq-.yirds in sy Nos 25ll/!9.'no} zslilnu,^{sltuated at peitJeerabad-Village,Medchat-MalkajgiriDistrict,as} direct the^{respondents to release} lf fegai, ;uff,^{void, arbitraryind} "ont"q'"ntly tn""p"*"t supply^{without insisting for occupancy certificate'}

¶17

I.A.N O:1 OF²⁰²³

¶18

PetitionUnderSectionl5lcPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstated in the affidavit^{filed in support of the peiition, lne UignCourt may bt-ll:1t^"1,t'} ;ir;"t ih;^{2nd and 3rd Respondentsto releasethe power supply to^ tne} Petitioners^{buildings ,t pi",i."tbearingPart of Plot No'8 (Western Part)'}

¶19

¶20

admeasuring620sqyardSinSy'Nos.2slliluand25l,1/RU,Situatedat Petbasheeribad Village,^{M ed ch al-M alkajg iri District}

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner^{: Sri.L.VishnuPrasad}

¶22

Counsel for the Respondent^{No.1 : GP For Energy}

¶23

CounselfortheRespondentNos'2&3:Sri.R.VinodReddy,SCForTSSPDCL

¶24

Counsel for the Respondent^{No.4 : Sri.M.Dhananjay Reddy,SC For GHMC}

¶25

The Court made the^{followingOrder :-}

¶26

¶27

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO} WRIT PETITION^{No.234O9 of2o23}

¶28

ORDER:

¶29

This writ petition^{is filedse eking the following relief}

¶30

"to issue an appropriate^{Writ, order or direction} more particularly^{one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus} declaring the action^{of the Respondents in not releasing} the power supply to^{the Petitionersbuilding at premises} bearing Part of Plot^{No.S(Western Part), admeasuring 62O} sq yards in sy.Nos.25lllLU^{and 25/llRU,Situated at} Petbasheerabad^{Village, Medchal-MalkajgiriDistrict, as} illegal, nutl, void,^{arbitrary and consequentlydirect the} respondents to^{release the powersupplywithout insisting} [or occupancy^{certificate."}

¶31

Heard learned^{counselfor the petitioner,learnedGovernment} Pleader for Enerry^{appearing for respondentNo' 1; Sri R'Vinod Reddy'} iearned Standing^{Counselfor TSSPDCLappearing for respondent} Nos. 2 and 3, and^{Sri.M.DhananjayReddy, learnedStanding counsel} appearing for resPondent^No.5.

¶32

It is represented by^{learned counsel appearing on behalf of the} petitioner and learned Standing^{Counsel appearing on behalfof the} respondents that^{the present writ petition is squarely coveredby the} order of this Court^{dated O9.O6.2023passed inW'P No 14322 ot} 2023, hence,^{the writ petition could be disposed of in terms of the} order of this Court^{dated 09.O6.2023 passed inW P'No'14322 of} 2023.

¶33

¶34

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the order of this Court dated 09.06.2023 passed in W.p.No. 14322 of 2O23. Howcver, there shall bc no ordcr as to cosLs.

¶35

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pcnding in this writ petition shall stand closcd

¶36

SD/.P.PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶37

//TRUE COPY// q

¶38

SECTION OFFICER

¶39

¶40

The Principal Secretary, Power and Energy Department, Secretariat, State of Telangana at Hyderabad-500022.

¶41

The Chairman and Managing Director, Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd., of Telangana, Mint Compound, Hyderabad.

¶42

The Superintending Engineer (Operation), Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd., of Telangana, Medchal Circle, Medchal.

¶43

The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Tankbund, Hyderabad.

¶44

Two CCs to GP For Energy, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

¶45

One CC to Sri.L.Vishnu Prasad, Advocate [OPUC]

¶46

7 One CC to Sri.R.Vinod Reddy, SC For TSSPDCL [OPUC] 8 One CC to Sri.M.Dhananjay Reddy, SC For GHMC [OPUC] o Two CD Copies

HIGH COURT

DATED:24t08t2023

ORDER

WP.No.23409 of 2023

.a
rnrs |r<br>,)$
(
7"\t<br>n;i
15 $tl tffi
Jil
//
. 1:
.' .';,
-.a r n. ..., .- .-
:-._'. 1-- '
:.

¶56

DISPOSING OF THE W.P WTHOUT COSTS.

¶57

Cr'to Vo-..fs)

¶58

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE^{MUMMINEI{ISUDHEER KUMAR}

¶59

qTRIT PETITIOIT No.14322 of 2023

¶60

ORDER:

¶61

Heard learned counsel^{for the petitioner,learned Government} Pleader for Encrgr, appcaring^{for respondent No.1.Sri R.Vinod} Reddy, learned Standing Counsel^{for TSSPDCL,appearing for} respondent Nos.2 and^3.

¶62

This Writ Petition is filed seeking^{a writ of Mandamus to} declare the action of the respondents^{in not releasingthe power} supply to the^{petitioner's buildingpremisesbearingH-No.5-9-} 24 /82, adneasuring 920 square^{yards. sltuatedat t ake Hills Road,} Hyderabad, arbitrary and illegal.

¶63

When the matter is taken up for hearing,^{it is submitted} by learned counsel for the^{petitionerthat the issue involved in this} writ petition is squarely covered^{by the orderpassed by this Court} in W.P.No.41259 of 2022, dated^{11.11.2022-The sameisnot} disputed by learned Govcrnment^{Pleader for Energr appearingfor} respondent No. 1 and Sri R.Vinod^{Reddy,learned StandingCounsel} for TSSPDCL, appearing for respondent^{Nos.2 and 3-}

¶64

In view of the above and for the^{reasons alike in the} said order, the Writ Petition^{is disposedof at the admissionstage} directing the respondents to release^{the powersupplrvto the subject} premises of the petitioner subject to^{petitioner complyingwith the}

¶65

¶66

¶67

tcrns and conditions^{and on furnishingan undertiuingto producc} the occupancy^{certiltcate from theMunicipalCorporatior-t} concerned,^{within a prescribedperiod and ifno such occupancy} certificate is^{produced r.t'ithin such prescribed time'} 't^{is open to the} respondents to^{takcappropriate action, in accordance with law'} There shall be^{no orderas to costs.}

¶68

Miscelianr:ous^{petltions, if any,pcr-rdingin lhrs rvrit petition} shall stand closed

¶69

MUMMINENI SUDHEER^{KUMAR, J}

¶70

Date:09.06.2023 YVI,

K. Ushasree v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

K. Ushasree v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Inayath Baig, Vs The State of Telangana

P Sathaiah, Warangal. Vs the State of Ts.,I and Cad.,Hyderabad, and 2 Otrs.

Smt M. Shamantha D/o M Narsimlu Vs State of Telangana Rep by its Principal Secretary Home

Thota Venkatesham Vs Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd. of Telangana

Narra Priyanka Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

K. Prasad Vs Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd., of Telangana