Dismissed

P Sathaiah, Warangal. v. the State of Ts.,I and Cad.,Hyderabad, and 2 Otrs.

Telangana HC23 Aug 2023WP/31114/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment is a one-line order wherein the High Court of Telangana dismissed Writ Petition No. 31114 of 2017 on the grounds that it was withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel with the permission of the court, without awarding costs.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions stand closed.

P Sathaiah, Warangal. Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³³⁰³ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 31114 OF 2017

¶8

Between:

¶9

P. Sathaiah, S/o. Late Bakkaiah, Hindu, Aged 54 years, working as Technical Officer Sri Ram Sagar Project Stage - H Division No.2, K.C. Camp, Chintagattu, Warangal, Rl/o Bhimaram Village, Hasanparthi Mandal, Warangal District - 506 015.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

1 The State of Telangana, I & CAD Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad - 500 022, Represented by Principal Secretary.

¶13

2 The Engineer-in-Chief (Admn. Wing), I & CAD Department, Telangana State, Jalasoudha Buildings, Errummanzll, Hyderabad - 500 086.

¶14

3 The Superintending Engineer, I & CAD Department, Telangana, State, SRSP Stage - ll Circle, K.C. Camp, Chintagattu Camp, Warangal - 506 015.

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of thg. Constitution of lndia^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction particularly a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing the impugned^proceedings No. SE/SRSP-Il/WgllEC-51123312PlS, dated - 04-09-2017 issued by 3rd respondent reverting the petitioner to the^post of Tracer from the^post of Technical Officer without any notice is arbitrary, illegal and also in violation of^principles of natural justice and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondents to continue the^petitioner as Technical Officer and^{grant him} all^{consequential} benefits arise thereon.

¶17

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 38774 OF 20171

¶18

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court^{may be pleasedto} suspend the impugned^proceedings No. SE/SRSP-lllWgllEC-s|1233/2PlS,^dated: O4-O9-2O17 issued by 3rd respondent reverting the^petitioner to^{the postof} Tracer from the post of Technical Officer^pending disposal of^Writ Petition.

¶19

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶20

Betwee n:

¶21

The State of Telangana, I & CAD Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad - 500 022, Represented by Principal Secretary.

¶22

The Engineer-in-Chief (Admn. Wing), I & CAD Department, Telangana State, Jalasoudha Buildings, Errummanzll, Hyderabad - 500 086.

¶23

The Superintending Engineer, I & CAD Department, Telangana, State, SRSP Stage - ll Circle, K.C. Camp, Chintagattu Camp, Warangal - 506 015.

¶24

...PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS

¶25

AND

¶26

P. Sathaiah, Warangal, working as Technical Officer Sri Ram Sagar Project Stage - H Division No.2, K.C. Camp, Chintagattu, Warangal, Rl/o Bhimaiam Village, Hasanparthi Mandal, Warangal District - 506 015.

¶27

...PETITIONER

¶28

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 15/09/2017 passed in WPMP No 3877412017 in WP No 3111412017 and to dismiss the WP.

¶29

Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. PRANAMI REPRESENTING FOR

¶30

SRI T.P. ACHARYA

¶31

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR IRRIGATION & CAD

¶32

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶33

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO

¶34

WRIT PETITION No.31114 of 2OL7

¶35

' ORDER:

¶36

Ms Pranami, learned counsel representing Sri T.p.Acharya, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.

¶37

Recording the above subnrission, the Writ petition is

¶38

dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

¶39

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shaJl

¶40

stand closed

¶41

To,

¶42

SD/. T. TIRUMALA DEVI ASSTSTANIREGTSTRAR QD SECTTON OFFICER

¶43

//TRUE COPY//

¶44

One CC to SRI T.P. ACHARYA, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR IRRIGATION & CAD, High Court for the Slate of Telangana. [OUT]

¶45

Two CD Copies

BN GJP

HIGH COURT

DATED:2310812023

1 1 E o
),
v$.
si
ls ),
ctt
| :.) s
- 'l.
::--.

¶50

ORDER

¶51

WP.No.31114 of 2017

¶52

DISMlSSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

P Sathaiah, Warangal. v. the State of Ts.,I and Cad.,Hyderabad, and 2 Otrs.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P Sathaiah, Warangal. v. the State of Ts.,I and Cad.,Hyderabad, and 2 Otrs.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Hari Krishna Rao, Khammam Vs Joint Managing Director, Tsrtc., Hyd and 3 Ot

E. Rajender and 45 Ors. Vs Chairman, Lic, Mumbai and 2 Ors.

Feroz Suleman Vs The Divisional Forest Officer

Inayath Baig, Vs The State of Telangana

Smt M. Shamantha D/o M Narsimlu Vs State of Telangana Rep by its Principal Secretary Home

Motheram Venkata Rajam, Vs The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary