The court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution due to lack of representation on its part.
Writ Petition dismissed for nonprosecution; miscellaneous petitions, if any, stood dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO.23277 of 2020
ORDER:
When the matter was listed on 05.01.2023, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel, Mr C. Kalyan Rao, appearing for respondent Nos.5 and 6 insisted this Court to take up the vacate stay petition viz., I.A.No.2 of 2022 in W.P.No.23277 of 2020 for vacating the interim order granted by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2020, dated 25.02.2021. However, this Court is of the opinion that since interim stay is in operation for more than one year, to give one more opportunity to the petitioners, listed this case under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today also, in spite of listing the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners.
_________________________ C.V.BHASKAR REDDY, J
19.01.2023 plp
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO.23277 of 2020
Date: 19.01.2023
plp
C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
