Petitioners sought to quash a draft layout permission via a writ petition. The petitioner requested withdrawal. Permission was granted to withdraw the petition, which was subsequently dismissed accordingly without orders on costs.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted. Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
132e6 |
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAYOF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY T}IREE PRESENT
TIIE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 7255 OF 2022
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
,..RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction one more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No. 2 in not considering the Objection Petition dated 06108/2021 filed by the Petitioners for revoking the draft Layout permission granted to the Respondent No.3 to 7 vide Permission No .001946/MED/LTIU6/HMDA/10072017 dated, 0110212018 and 16/02/2018 is illegal, arbitrary and Unconstitutional and consequently direct the Respondent No.2 to consider the Objection Petition dated 0610812021 filed by the Petitioners and thereby revoke the draft Layout permission.
IA NO:2 OF2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the draft layout permission granted to the Respondent No. 3 to 7 vide Layout permission No.00 1 946/ME D/ LTiU6IHMDA / I 007 20 I 7 dated 0 I / 021 2O | 8 and | 6 / 0212O 18
IA NO: I OF 2022
Petition under Section l5l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support ol the petition, thc l{igh Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No. 2 to consider the objection petition dated 06-08-2021 made by the Petitioners thereby not to release the final layout in respect of the land in Sy. Nos. 599/C and 600/8, Devar Yamjal Village, Shamirpel Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri District toan extent of 24870. 48 Sq.Mt.
Counsel for the Petitioncr:
Counsel for the Respondent No. l:
SRI. NARESH REDDY CHINNOLLA GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV(tG)
Counsel for the Respondent No. 2:
SRI. V. NARSIMHA GOUD
The Court made the followilrg:
-7
I
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
W'RIT PETITION NO.7255 of 2022
ORDER:
l.earned counsel for the petitioner submitted a letter dated
L7.O1.2O23 on the file of the Registry seeking permissiion of this Court
to withdraw the writ petition.
order as to costs.
shall stand dismissed.
I
SD/.T.JAYASREE ASSISTANT ISTRAR
l
//TRUE COPYII
SECTION FFICER
To, l. One CC to StU. NARESH REDDY CHINNOLLA Advocate [OPUC]
HIGII COTIRT
CVBR, J
DATFI,D: l9l01/2023
ORDIIII
WP.No.7255 of 2022
1 HE STAT €
e
rtB 2[8 z
3 [0 )r
{o.--^..'--S=-=-;-=,
WRIT PETITION IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
K.Ramchandra Reddy
K.Chandrakala Reddy
The State of Telangana
Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority
K.Sreedhar Reddy
K. Chandrakala
C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
