The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the construction of a crematorium on his agricultural land via a canal inspection road. The respondents stated the crematorium had been shifted, causing the petition to lose its basis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
t t I t I I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P,MADHAVI DEVI
WRIT PETITION NO: 21663 OF 2021
Between:
Nalla Vijendar, S/o Venkat Reddy, Aged about 40 years, OccAgriculture, R/o.Bikkajipally Village, Duggondi Mandal, Warangal Rural District
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of theConstitutionof lndiaprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith,the High Court maybe pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Directionparticularly one in thenature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugnedaction of the Tahsildarin conducting
Panchama for identifying the land for alleged purpose of construction of a crematorium on 60 feet SRSP Canal inspection road high handedly blocking Petitioners entry and exit into his agricultural land to an extent of Ac.2.25 Gts in Sy.No. 68/8/1/2,68lcl4,71lAl3 and 73lCl1 of Reballi Village, Duggandi Mandal, Warangal Rural District at the instance of politically reasons and the inaction of other Respondents in allowing the illegal construction of the crematorium on the 60 feet DBM-38 canal inspection road as arbitrary, illegal, withoutjurisdiction, violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents to remove the illegal, unauthorized construction of the crematorium by further directing the Respondent No. 1 to take necessary action against the erring officials.
lA No: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to stop further illegal construction of the crematorium on the 60 feet canal inspection road, DBM-38 canal, Sriram Sagar Project, abutting the Petitioners lands in Sy.Nos. 68181112, 68lcl4,71lAl3 and 73lCl1 of Reballi Village, Dugganti Mandal, Warangal Rural District to an extenl of Ac.2.25 Gts-
lA No: 4 OF 2021
Between:
The Gram Panchayat, Reballi Rep by Sarpanch, Reballi village, Duggondi lvlandal, Warangal Rural District.
AND
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to dismiss the above Writ Petition by vacating the interim orders dated OBlOgl2O2l along with amended Order dated 17logl2o21 passed in l.A.No.3 of 2021 in W.P.No,21663 of 2O21 .
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI S.RAHUL REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : GP FOR IRRIGATION & GAD
Counsel forthe Respondent No.4 : GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.S &6 : G NARENDER REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.7 to 9 : GP FOR REVENUE
: ORDER The Court made the following
I
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI
W.P.No. 2L663 OF 2021
ORDER:
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition was filed against the construction of crematorium in the agricultural land of the petitioner in Survey Nos.68/B/1/2, 68/C/4, 7t/Al3 & 7s/C/1 of Reballi Village, Duggandi Mandal, Warangal Rural District
5, Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand cloSed.
I
//TRUECOPY//"'^5,',EFiffi[IXX7
SECTIONOFFICER
HIGH COURT
DATED:0610112023
ORDER WP.No.21663 of2021
ST AT E
1\AE
q
1t8
o I 1 I TB i-
'J
>'^ t
* i) E S P
WRIT PETITION IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS.
ItGgtr) ESh rr )*1tl-79
Nalla Vijendar
State of Telangana
P.Madhabi Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
