Partly allowed

Thakur Raja Singh v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC17 Oct 2023WP/20808/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana disposed of two petitions: a Writ Petition seeking quashing of criminal FIRs alleging improper criminalisation of a civil dispute, and an application for interim disposal, as the Writ Petition was listed only for permission to withdraw. Permission was granted, and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail other remedies.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw writ petition; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty; miscellaneous petitions dismissed.

Thakur Raja Singh Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^32e6 ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 20808 oF 2023

¶8

Between:

¶9

1 Thakur Raja Singh, S/o. Harisingh, Aged 47 years, Occ: Business, R:/o. 12-g47, P ragathi Nagar, Sircilla, Rajanna-Siricilta District.

¶10

2 lMekala Kamalakar, S/o Mekala Sathaiah, Aged 39 years, Occ: Business, R/o. 2-6-78, Sanjeevaiah Nagar, Sircilla, Rajanna--siricill; Dist;ict.

¶11

...PETITIONERS

¶12

AND

¶13

1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶14

2 The Director General of Police, State of Telangana, Lakdi-ka-pul, Hyderabad

¶15

3 The Superintendent of Police, Rajanna-Siricilla District, Siricilla.

¶16

4 The Circle lnspector of Police, Police Station, Siricilla, Rajanna-siricilla District.

¶17

5 The Sub-lnspector of Police, Police Station, Siricilla, Rajanna-Siricilla District.

¶18

6 Shamim Sulthana, W/o. Abdul Majeed, Aged 65 years, Occ: Nil, R/o. Vidyanagar, Sircilla, Rajanna-Siricilla District

¶19

...RESPONDENTS

¶20

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4th and 5th respondents in registering criminal cases in FIR No. 141 of 2023 dated 05-04-2023, and FIR No. 112 of 2023 dated 16-03-2023 against the petitioners herein basing on the registered Sale Deed Doct.No. 43212022, dated^'19-01-2022, registered in the

¶21

i I I I i I

¶22

office of Sub-Registrar, Siricilla, executed by the 6rf' respondent, which is purely civil in nature, and consequently, to direct the 2"d respondent to cause enquiry into the matter and to take appropriate action against the 4th and 5th respondents, in the interests of justice.

¶23

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶24

Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 0910312023, pending disposal of Writ Petition.

¶25

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI T. RAMCHANDER RAO

¶26

Counsel for the Respondent No,'l to 5: ASST. GP FOR HOME

¶27

Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI T. SURYA SATISH

¶28

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶29

THE HON'BLE^{SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASI{AR REDDY}

¶30

WRIT PETITION No.2O8O8 of^2o23

¶31

ORDER:

¶32

Learned counsel appearing^{for thepetitionersseeks} permission of tl-ris Court^{to u'iLhdrarn' the writ petitionwitha}

¶33

liberty to avail the^{remedies availableunder law}

¶34

Permissiou as sought^{for is accorded.}

¶35

Accorclingll', the^{Writ Petition is dismissedas withdrawn}

¶36

rvith the aforesaid libertv.^{No order as to costs'}

¶37

4 Miscellaneous^{petitions, if any pending in this writ petition}

¶38

shall stand dismissed

¶39

SD/- G.SIREESHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// qe

¶40

¶41

SECTION OFFICER

¶42

To, 1. One CC to SRI T. RAMCHANDER RAO, Advo.Etq [9PUC1 i. il; cc 6^{SRi T. sURYAsATlsH, Advocate tol'ucl} -- 5. i;; dc;i"-GF^{FoR t-lot'/e, Hisn court for the state of relansana} tourl

¶43

Two CD CoPies

BNGJ >z-

HIGH COURT

DATED:1711012023

ORDER

WP.No.20808 of 2023

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

Thakur Raja Singh v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thakur Raja Singh v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. V.V.S.N. Lakshmi Kumari Vs The State of Telangana

Mohd. Shoeb Ali Omrez Vs The State of Telangana

Nandikonda Sobharani Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. T.Radhika Vs The State of Telangana

Matta Venkataiah Goud Vs B. Sandeep

Sarojini Devi Rao Vs The State of Telangana