Matta Venkataiah Goud v. B. Sandeep
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court in this contempt case examined allegations of violation of court orders concerning construction permissions. Observing the authorities had acted and no new deviations occurred, the court concluded there was no willful disobedience and closed the case.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications shall stand closed.
What the court decided
[32e6 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKARREDDY
CONTEMPT CASE N o: 1766 of 2023
Contbmpt Case filed under Sections 10 to 12 ofContemptof CourtsAct to punish the respondents herein for wilfully and deliberately violating the Orders ofthe High Court dated 17-03-2023passed in l.A.No.1 of2023in W.P.No.7588 of 2023. Between:
- Matta Venkataiah Goud, S/o ChinnaNagaiah Goud, 42 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o H.No.'t6-13, Veldanda Village and Mandal,NagarkurnoolDistrict.
- Yennam Chandra Mohan Reddy, S/oNarayan Reddy,Aged 62 years, Occ. Business, Fi/o H.No.7-135, VeldandaVillage and Mandal,Nagarkurnool District
- Pasnoju Purushottama Chary, S/oVenkatachary,Aged 40 years,Occ 'Ex Serviceman, Rl/o Veldanda Village andMandal, NagarkurnoolDistrict.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents willfully violated the High Court orders regarding construction permissions.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Matta Venkataiah Goud
- petitioner
Yennam Chandra Mohan Reddy
- petitioner
Pasnoju Purushottama Chary
- petitioner
Basnamoni Srinivasulu
- respondent
B. Sandeep
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/1766/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court