Dismissed

Smt. D. Anusha v. The Station House Officer

Telangana HC23 Nov 2023WP/20295/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Telangana High Court granted permission to withdraw a writ petition filed under Articles 226, 14, and 21 of the Constitution and Section 156 of CrPC. The court inclined to allow the applicants to file a private complaint against the unofficial respondents.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail legal remedies including filing a private complaint was granted. No costs.

Smt. D. Anusha Vs The Station House Officer — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

t^32e6l

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF NOVEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 20295 0F 2023

¶7

Between:

¶8

1 9ft,.D,^{Anusha,W/o Sri NageswaraRao,} Aged.2g^years, Occ. House Wife. 2 rygI ^No^{11-1-119. Data C5tony,HayrargioO";,} Secuil;;;bad" rfl u. Nageswara Rao, S/o peddaiah, Aged. 33 years, Occ. Business,

¶9

Petitioners 1 and 2 are residents of RJo H. No. 11-1-119, Data corony, Mylargadda, Secunderabad

¶10

AND

¶11

.,.PETITIONERS

¶12

1 The Station House officer. chirkarguda porice station, opp. sridevi rheatre, Chilkalguda, Secunderabad.

¶13

1. Police Commissionerate.The Assistant commissioner of porice, chirkarguda Division, Hyderabad city

¶14

J. The Deputy Superintendent of police, East Zone, Hyderabad City police Commissionerate.

¶15

The,Director General of police, Lakdi-ka-pul, Hyderabad. 5. The state of relanoana- Rep. by its priricifrar 'secretarv (Home), secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶16

Sri K. L. Vishnu Murthv. S/o K.L. Ashok, Aged. 32 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o Beside Saptami Grand, Seetaphatmindi: SE;J;J;;ba;.

¶17

Ms. K.L. Anuradha, D/o K.L. Ashok, Occ. Advocate practicing at TSHC, Fyo H. No. 12-10-590/l26, Warasiguda, SecundeiaUiO:OrI'

¶18

...RESPONDENTS

¶19

Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue writ or order more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No. .1 kept pending the Petitioners compraints vide Acknowredgment No. HyD/cKD_HYD/300623/01696 dated 30.06.2023 and through postar R.p.A.D. dated 01 .07.2023 agaisnt the Respondents No.6 and 7 and not taken any action for investigation as iregar, arbitrary and vioration of fundamenta{ rights guaranteed under Articres 14,21 of constitution of rndia and under the provision of sec. 156 and 157 of code of

¶20

criminal Procedure, 1973 subsequenfly direct the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to take appropriate action for protection of the petitioners and her famiry on the guise of threatening by unofficial respondents No. 6 and 7 lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶21

Petition under section 15i cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondents Nos.^'1 to 3 to take appropriate action and report of compliance by conducting investigation on petitioners comF,laints vide Acknowledgment No. HYD/cKD HyD/300623/0'1696 dated 30.Ori.2023 and through Postal R.P.A.D. dated 01 .o7.2023 aganist the Respondents No. 6 and 7 pending disposal of the above writ petition

¶22

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. K. RAMACHANDRA Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1to5: Gp FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 6&7: None Appeared The Court made the following: ORDER

¶23

HON'BLE^{SRI JUSTICE C'V'BHASKARREDDY} WRITPE^{TITIoNNo -20295of.2o2S}

¶24

ORD^ER:

¶25

Learned^{counselappearlngfor the Petitioner seeks} permission^{of the Court to r'r'ithdraw this writ petition' with} a liberty^{to avail the remedie s as availablein law including} filing^{of pnvate complaint againsttheunofficial} respondents^'

¶26

Permission^{as sought for is accorded}

¶27

1S dismissed S AccordingiY,^{the writPetitlon} withdrawn^{with a liberty to avail the remediesas available} in law.^{No costs}

¶28

As a^{sequel,the miscellaneouspetitions pending' if}

¶29

any, shail^{stand closed'}

¶30

HUSHAMB^A SD/.P.CH.NAGAB REGIS^T R ASSISTANT

¶31

//TRUE^COPY// SECTION^OFFICER

¶32

To,

¶33

1 Two CCs to^{GP FORHOME} 'High^{Court for the State of Telangana'at} , BIi"Lt?S^{l?t?. **^"HANDRA'AdvocatetoPUCl} 3. Two^{CD CoPies} BM SB $--

HIGH COURT

DATED:23 t11t2023

ORDER

1 e SrAfE
q v
:)
1 3 ltc 2021
C)r)
{

:-, h:l i:
:;a::=-' "

¶38

WP.No.20 295 of 2023

¶39

DISMTSSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WTHDRAWN WITHOUT COSi' &

Smt. D. Anusha v. The Station House Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. D. Anusha v. The Station House Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Banala.Rajesh, Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. Mittapally Padmavathi Vs Smt.a.Nagamani

Vemula Praveen Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Enjamuri Sravani @ Kukkala Sravani Vs Venkat Rao

Vaddepally Rajender Vs The State of Telangana

Thandu Veeraiah, Vs The State of Telangana