Smt. Mittapally Padmavathi v. Smt.a.Nagamani
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court ordered that the contempt case filed for violation of interim orders be closed without costs after vacation of those orders.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case is closed without costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OFTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
.. il.
THE HONOURABLE SR!JUSTICE C.V. BHASKARREDDY
CONTEMPT GASE NO: 1734OF 2023
Between:
Smt. Mittapally Padmavathi, WoM.Tilakchandra,Aged about 40 years, Occupation Housewife, R/o H.No.6-1 -585 lBl2O, Maruthinagar, Khairartabad, Hyderabad-500004.
...PET!T!ONER NO.4
AND
1 . Smt.A.Nagamani, T1 he Deputy Commissioner, Circle- 25, Quthbullapur, GreaterHyderabadMunicipal Corporation, Hyderabad. R1 cause title amended asper court order dt.01.1 1.2023 in lA 2 of 2023 inCC 1734 of 2023.
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENT NO.3
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Smt. Mittapally Padmavathi
- respondent
Smt. A. Nagamani
- respondent
Sri. Mukesh Jangid
- respondent
Smt. Ruchika Jangid
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/1734/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court