The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 19995 of 2009 filed under Articles 226 and Section 151 CPC via non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear on two consecutive listing dates despite orders for dismissal without appearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 19995 OF 2009
Between:
M.Rama Chandra Reddy, S/o. Late Narsimha Reddy Business R/o C/o. Chandra Garden, harmanghat, Vaishali Nagar Post, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of Prohibition restraining the 1st respondent herein from adjudicating the appeal No. A2i 1358 of 2009 filed under Sec. 5(5) of A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act 1971 filed by the respondents 3 and 4 herein aggrieved by the order bearing proceedings No. 81126212008 dated 21-O3.2OO9 of the 2nd respondent pending disposal of O.S.No. 453 of 2008 on the file of the Court of I Additional District Judge, R.R.District at L.B.Nagar.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2009(WPM P. NO: 26072 OF 2009
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in appeal No. A2l1358 of 2009 filed under Sec. 5(5) of A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadarpass Books Act.1971 filed by the respondents 3 and 4.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY
Counsel for the Respondents No.1&2 : GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondents No.3&4 : SRI M.V.DURGA PRASAD The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTTCE.I. SREEI{TVAS RAO
Writ Petition No. 19995 of 2OO9
ORDER:
When the matter was taken up for consideration on 12.12.2023, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. To give one opportunity, the matter is posted to 15.12.2023 under the caption "For Dismissal".
non-prosecution. No costs.
SD/- K.AMMAJI
I
ASSISTANT IS //TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 511212023
ORDER
g.rATE 9a
{
(
5 o tq Ir\ $q S)
*,
4 tJ lr:, PA:I
WP.No.19995 of 2009
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
@a1v> GW
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M.Rama Chandra Reddy
The Revenue Divisional Officer, East Division, R.R.District, Goshamahal, Hyderabad
The Deputy Collector & Tahsildar, Hayatnagar, R.R.District
Samreddy Muthyam Reddy
S.Narayana Reddy
J SREENIVAS RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
