The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the Central Administrative Tribunal's order because the petitioners had already implemented said orders. The court held the petition non-maintainable.
The writ petition was dismissed without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3318 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 19295 OF 201s
Between
AND
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutron of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF CERTIORARI calling for records in connection with the order passed in OA No.6B0/2012 dated 15-10-2014 on the file of the 1st respondent/Tribunal and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary. u nconstitutional and against the principles of naturaljustice.
l.A. NO:2 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 24952OF 20151
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to suspend the operation and effect of the order passed in OA No.680/2012 dated 15-10-2014 on the file of the 1st respondent/Tribunal, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.
LA. NO: 1 OF 201s(WVMP. NO: 2929 OF 2015)
Between
M.A Rasheed Jameel, S/o t\il.A.G. Jameel Aged about 45 years, Occ: Health lnspector Guntakal Railway Station S.C. Rly, Guntakal Division, Guntakal Anantapur District.
...PETITIONERS/ RESPONDENT AND
7 . Dr K Kondaiah. ST.MDO/Admn/Hubil Division S W Railway Hospital, Hubli
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim suspension order granted in WPMP No. 24952 ol 2015 in WP No. '19295 of 20 15. dated 06.07.2015 in the interest of justice
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P.DEVENDER Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI M.A.RASHEED JAMEEL (PARTY-INPERSON)
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: -- The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 19295 of 2O15
ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble Si Justice Abhinand Kumar Shauili)
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri M.A.Rasheed Jameei, part-y in person i.e., respondent No.2 has informed the Court that the orders dated 01.10.20 14 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (for short, 'the Tribunal') in O.A.No.680 of 2012, rvere implemented b-y the petitioners uide proceedings, dated 12.O2.2OI5 and aJter implementing the Tribunal's orders, the present Writ Petition is filed. Therefore, the cause in the writ petition cioes not survive as the petitioners have already implemented the orders dated O l.l}.2ol4 passed b-v the Tribunal in O.A.No.68O of 2012. In vier.r' o[ the same, writ petition may be dismissed.
)
AKS,J & RRN,] lvP_19295_2015
order as to costs
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending if an_v,
shall stancl closed.
SD/.K. SREERAMAMURTHY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE coPY/'
aECTtoNKFFtcER
To
1 M.A Rasheed Jameel(PARTY lN PERSOL'I). S/o M A G J-ameglAg^ed about IS v"ur., O". Healthlhspector Guntakal Rdilway Station S C. Rly. Guntakal Division. GuntakalAnantapurDistrict 2 One CC to SRI PDEVENDER, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CD Copies
I'SK. llsw-
HIGH COURT
DATED:0611212023
ORDER
WP.No.19295 of 2015
1 $E STA 16,
(
q
3 .) zs 0E[ 202] o t
A:
*;,
\ ,
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS.
5.a,8ue w- ;7x'>
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is maintainable when the impugned Tribunal orders have already been implemented.
Whether the High Court should grant the writ of certiorari to quash the Tribunal's order.
The Union of India, Rep. by General Manager South Central Railway
M.A. Rasheed Jameel
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
