Disposed

Kombattula Lakshmidhar v. Telangana State South Power Distribution Corporation Ltd.

Telangana HC7 Nov 2023WP/18612/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petitioner challenged a disconnection of electricity supply as arbitrary and against natural justice. Upon submission that an interim order from 07-07-2023 rendered further orders unnecessary, the court closed the writ petition without costs.

What did the court decide?

None. The writ petition was closed without costs based on an existing interim order.

Kombattula Lakshmidhar Vs Telangana… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³³⁰⁰¹

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 18612 OF 2023

¶7

Between:

¶8

Kombattula Lakshmidhar, S/o. K. lrr'lukundha Prasad, Aged about.44 yrs, Occ. Business, Rl/o. Plot No.134, 9th Phase, KPHB Colony, Maleshiyan Township Circle, Kukatpally, Hyderabad-500072

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 Telangana State South Power Distribution Corporation Ltd, Rep. by its Chief lt/anaging Director, Vidyuth Soud ha, Hyderabad.

¶12

2 The E.R.O., T.S.S.P.D.C.L, Kondapur, Hyderabad.

¶13

3 The Assistant Engineer, T.S S.P.D.C.L, KPHB Colony, Hyderabad.

¶14

4 Nannpaneni Sushma, Wo. N.Sridhar, Aged about. 45 yrs, Occ. Business.

¶15

5 Nannpaneni Sridhar, S/o. N. Sankar Rao, Aged about_ 50 yrs, Occ. Business, R4 and R5 are R:/o.HlG 106 and 1O7,Flat No.103, Sarayu Sadan Apartments, Vl Phase, KPHB Colony, Kukatpally, Hyderabad 72.

¶16

..RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petitron under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one on the nature of Writ of mandamus by declaring the disconnection of electricity supply by Respondents No.1 to 3 to the Petitioners premises Electricity service No.3710 19801 , ULC No.'109930089 is as illegal, arbitrary and against the principle of natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondents No.1 to 3 to restore the electricity connection immedlately to the Petitioners electncity service number No 3710 19801, ULC No.109930089 at premises of Jahansi Shakar Plaza, Ground FIoor premises No.1 5-29-1000/HG 55, Ground Floor. Phase-3, Near Venkateswara Swamy Temple Bus stop, KPHB Colony, Kukatpally. R R. District.

¶18

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶19

Petition under Section r 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may bt-. pleased to direct the Respondent No.1 to 3 to pass lnterim direction the restore the Petitioner's electricity service number No.371019g01, uLC No.1099300g9 of premises at Jahansi Shakar praza, Ground Froor premises No.1 5-29-1000/HG 55, Ground Floor,^phase-3, Near Venkaleswara Swamy Temple Bus stop, KpHB Colony, Kukatpally, R. R. District pending disposal of the Writ petition.

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI O.RAMESH

¶21

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: SRI R.VINOO REDDY, SC FOR TSSPDCL

¶22

Counsel for the Respondent No.4 & 5: SRt K.SUNIL GOUD

¶23

The Court made the following: ORDER

HE HON OURAB LE^{SRI JI,STICE NAGESHBHEE} MAPAKA WRIT PETI^{TOIN No.18612of2023}

¶28

ORDER:

¶29

When the matter^{is taken up for hearing' Mr'R'Vinod} Reddy, learned^{Stalding Counselfor TSSPDCL appearingfor} respondent^{Nos- 1, 2 and 3 submittedthat in view of the interim} order granted^{by this Court on lg 'O7 '2023} '^{no further orders} are necessary^{in this u'rit petition'}

¶30

Recording^{the said submission, the Writ Petition is closed'No} costs

¶31

Miscellaneous^{petitions pending, if any' in this writ petitron'} shall stancl^closed.

¶32

SD/. T.^JAYASREE ASSISTANT^REGIST

¶33

To,

¶34

//TRUE^GOPY//

¶35

2 3 EI: EE^E iii^{fl ,lffiFis0ffi i"?iifhucl} 4 Two CD^CoPies

SECTION^OFFICER

oPUc

BSR GJP

HIGH COURT

DATED: 0711112023

ORDER

WP.No.18612 of 2023

1 ST4 r6
(
o
t) 0 B 0tt 2[23 !)
* : P;;i cv -l\ :'-, j,;r' -,. _ .:.' ./
.----:-J

¶46

CLOSING THE WRIT^PETITION,

¶47

WITHOUT COSTS

¶48

a @r?' b- l1<sup>a3

Kombattula Lakshmidhar v. Telangana State South Power Distribution Corporation Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kombattula Lakshmidhar v. Telangana State South Power Distribution Corporation Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M. Bal Singh Died per Lr Vs Apsrtc, Hyderabad and Another

M/S.United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Sri Ravula Laxmaiah and Anr.

Rapani Ramulamma Vs Shaik Mahaboob (Age Major)

M/s Sanghi Polymers Pvt. Ltd., Vs The Employees State Insurance Corporation

M/S.Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Vs M/S.Sharada Mechanical Engineering,Hyd,and 2

Malka Nagesh Ram Nagar, Mancherial and 19 Others Vs the Northern Power Distri Co. Ltd. Cmd Warangal and Another