Petitioners challenged tender conditions regarding cheque submission and local preference. Standing Counsel submitted the matter was infructuous, leading to dismissal.
No relief granted. Writ petitions dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3300 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE Of TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: 13492 OF 2011
Between:
It
15 M' Upender Reddv. S/o Venkat Reddy,. aged about 42 yearc, occ Erectricjtv Contractor, Rl/o Shastrinagar, Nirmal, b'istii"ilioiLird
AND
Petition under Articre 226 0f rhe constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit rireo ir,"l"iritn, the High courl: may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, oroeior Ji;;1,.;, more particularly ,cne in the nature of Writ of Mandamus d_ectaring th" ir;;;;;; tender conditions in Tender Notice 03/2010-11 sE/Op/ADe ot tr-q-i011'*i'ri[i"o in Andhra Jvorhi rerugu daily by the 2nd respondent regarding *"o,tri rvo'la in the special condition and other aspects raised in the representition of the petitioners dt.2o-4-2o11is iregar, arbitrary and . contrary to ihe terms ";i ;;;;i,ons or the Contract and consequen'y direct the respondents not to proceed itn tn" tender process before considering the crarifications regarding submission of cheques without date, assurance to give preference onry to rocar cont;ctors ,no'o,"i ,oplctl-"" l"nt"rest of justice. mentioned in the representation dt.io_4_2Of i i" it "
I.A. NO:1 oF 2011(WPMP. NO :16359 oF 2011)
Petition under Section.l5i cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support_of the petitioir',-il"'nigi'iorn may be preaseri to direct the respondents not to orgcged with the fenOJrs -unOer 03/2010-1r sE/o'/ADB dr-7 .4 201r prtri."n"J'r "ondh* the Tender Notice No. Jyothi rer,-,gu dairy including opening of the tenders, p"noing dir;o";r of tne .a,n writ petitior.
Counsel for the petitioners: SRI C. HARI PREETH i;Jt".1ff:l"T;:?3,?ff;;[:zAKicAti;;l-rsHr sc FoR rsNpDcL )
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAI(A
1VRIT PETITOIN No.13492 of 2Oll
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.R.Vinod Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for TSSPDCL appearing for respondents submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and hence, the matter has become infructuous.
as infructuous. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this writ petition, shall stand closed.
SD/.MOHD.SANAULLAHANSART ./ ASSISTANT REGIS R //TRUE COPY// VI SECTION OFFICER
To, 1- One CC to M/s. C.Hari Preeth,Advocate [OPUC] Z. One CC to Sri ZaktAli Danish( SC for TSNPDCL ) [OPUC] 3. Two CD Copies TJ GJP \V
I
!
HIGH COURT
DATED:0711112023
ORDER
WP.No.13492 of 2011
.\ E. liTAtC-
k
q
o
13 BEI 20m oz
-L
,+
t
-k t) ESl,ATC$
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
AS INFRUCTUOUS
WITHOUT COSTS.
Contractor, Proprietor M/s. Malka Nagesh and 19 Others
The Northern Power Distribution Company Limited (Ansarwar) Regional Reps by its Chief Executive
The Superintending Engineer / Operation Circle NPDCL Adilabad
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
MOHD. SANAULLAHANSART
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
