High Court dismissed Writ Petition 18538 of 2017 as infructuous without costs on the ground that the petitioner was no longer working in the same department, rendering the cause untenable for adjudication.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33181
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINANDKUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPURAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO:'18538 OF20'17
Between:
Rai Kumar, S/o. Shiv Kumar Ram, Aged about42 years,Occ LocoPilot (Pdssenger) O/o The Chief Crew Controller, Hydgrabad Division, South Central Railway, Near Kachiguda StationHyderabad,R:/oHyderabad.
... PETITIONERS/7 th RESPONDENT!N OA1379 I2O1 1
AND
10.The Hon'ble Central AdministrativeTribunal, Represented by its Registrar, Hyderabad Bench, HACA Bhavan,Hyderabad.
Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitutionof lndiaprayingthat in the circumstances stated in theaffidavitfiledtherewith,the High Court may be pleased to set aside the Judgment of the Hon'ble centralAdministrativeTribunal,
I I! ! ! I l
Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad dated 1O-3-2O17 in OA 1379/2011 by issuance of Writ of Certiorari
t.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 22625 OF 2O1', l)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, tlre High Court may be pleased to suspend the Judgment of the Hon'ble Central ,Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad dated 10-3-2017 in OA 137912011
!A NO: 1 OF 2018
Between:
A. Srinivas, S/o A.T. Brahman, Aged about 43 years, Occ Senior Assistant Loco Pilot, O/o The Chief Crew Controller, Kachiguda, South Central Railway, Hyderabad.
AND
....RESPONDENT IN OA 1379/2011/RESPONDENTS
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacale the interim suspension granted vide order dated 09.06.2017 in WPMP No. 22625 of 2017 in WP No.'lB53B of 2017 in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. J. SUDHEER
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1 : SRI K. R, K. V. PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 to 7: SRl. K. ARVIND KUMAR ,
CENTR,{L GOVERNMENT COUNSEL Counsel for the Respondent Nos.8to 10: Norre Appeared The Court made the following: ORDER
I
I
/
HON'BIF SRI JUSTICE ABHINANDKUMARSHAVILI AND
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPURAJESIIWAR RAO
W.P.No.185 38 0F m17
ORDER: f)ar Haa'bkSn lniteAbhirazd KttnarShavili)
\fltren the matter is taken upfor hearing, leamed counsel
appearing for the petfuionersubmimed that since the petitioneris no more working in thesamedepanment,the cause in the writ
petition does not survivefor adjudication.
In view of the same,the Writ Petitionis dismissedas
infructuous. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions,if any, pending shall standclosed
SD/- K. VENKAIAH ASSISTANT REGIS
//TRUE COPY//
SECTIO OFFICER
To, 1. The Registrar,Hon.bleCbntral Administrative Tribunal,HyderabadBench, HACA Bhavan. Hvderabad.
z. one Cc to sFil. i. suoueeR,Advocate [oPUCI - 5. o;; cc io snl.K. R. K. V. PRASAD, Advoclrte tgP^uql- -,-..;. il; cc 6 sRi.k. AnVtNoKUMAR, cENTRAL GovERNMENT couNSELIOPUCI
Prte.
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1 510912023
ORDER
1t'E S14 16-
o
{l
a
i(i
1B 0[I208
..:..
WP.No.18538 ot 2017
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTOUS WITHOUT COSTS
It\to,,3
Rai Kumar
A. Srinivas
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
