High Court at Hyderabad dismissed contempt proceedings filed for willful disobedience of an interlocutory order as infructuous since the main writ petition was subsequently dismissed without issuing further orders in the contempt case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3318 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAYOF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
:PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
co NTEMPT CAS E NO: 1742 OF 2023
Contempt Case filed Under Sections 1O lo 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents herein for wilfully and disobedience the orders of the High Court dated 14.07.2023 passed in l.A.No_1 of 2023 in W.p.No . 18674 ot 2023
Between:
1 . P. Lokasvi, D/o Anit Mukherji, Occ. Student, RJo. Hyderabad. 2. t,4. Saipurnaa, S/o tvl. Ramesh, Occ. Student, No 4-l-15, Raghavendra Nagar, Nacharam, Hyderabad.
...Petitioners/petitioners
AND
Dr. S. Sandhya, Registrar, Kaloji Narayan Rao University of Health Sciences, Warangal, Telangana.
...RespondenURespondent No.2
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. P S RA.JASEKHAR
Counsel for the Respondent : Sri A PRABHAKAR RAO
The Court made the following:
THEHON,BLE SRI ]USTICEABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THEH.N'BLE sRr lusrrt'[oto'oAPURA]E'HARRAo
o 1 2 oF22 c TE MPT
ORDER:(PerAKS'J)
underSections 10 to 12 of the ThisContemPtCase' 1977,is filed bY the Petitionersto Contemptof Courts Act' for willfuldisobedienceofthe punishthe resPondent 14.O7.2023,Passed bY this Court interlocutoryorder' dated in W.P.No.1B674 of 2023'
up forhearlng,learned 2. Whenthe matter is taken informedthe Court that coun sel for the Petitionershas non-complianceof the interlocutory order' dated alleging passed bythis Court in W'P'No'18674of 2023' !4.O7.2023, the Present ContemptCase is filed' However' subsequent to presentContempt Case' the main Writ Petition filingof the In viewof the same'no furtherorders itselfwas dismissed' passedin this Contempt Case and the arerequired to be ContemPtCase maY be closed'
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any,pending in thisContempt
Case, shall stand closed
/iTRUECOPY//
,".m+tH?[xt q
SECTIONOFFICER
To, 1 2. 8ffi . 8ffi 8ffi33 B sfi ,'dffi'ff5[if i'Ysf E5'y3i
1 2. 8ffi . 8ffi 8ffi 3. TwoCD CoPies
SP pr
\a+-
\
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 Sl09t2O2S
ORDER
CC.No.1742 of 2023
'l:.,
.1 ,'i:,
..
2E stI lm
.i 1.-.-.
- -:.-. ,
CONTEMPT CASE IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
5L9,{eo .t Rlro\z'3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt case should be dismissed as the underlying writ petition was dismissed sub sequently
P. Lokasvi
S. Saipurnaa
Dr. S. Sandhya
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
