The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 challenging orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal. The court followed a previous order dated 11.09.2023 in W.P. No. 19467 of 2014 on the same issue.
The writ petition was dismissed. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3318 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 17690 OF 2014
Between:
...PETITIONERS/ RESPONDENTS IN OA 90512011
AND
...RESPONDENTS/ PETITIONERS/ APPLICANTS 1-3 IN OA 905/2011
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari, or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction calling for the records pertaining to O.A.NO. 90512011 Dated - 2510712013 on the file of Central Administrative Tribunal Hyderabad Bench Hyderabad, and quash the same, as illegal, arbitrary, in gross violation of Principles of Natural Justice and unconslitutiona I and further declare that these orders have been passed without any jurisdiction vested in the Honorable CAT Hyderabad Bench Hyderabad
l.A. NO:'l OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 22 146 0F 2014l,
Petilion under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin the circunrstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the HighCourt mayDe pleasedto suspend the operation of the orders in OA No.905 of 2011, dated.25.O7.2013 on the file of the Central Administrative Tribunal. HyderabadBench,Hyderabad, pending disposal of the Writ Petition
Counsel for the Petitioners : MS. PUSHPINDERKAUR
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : SRIK.R.K.V.PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondent No.4 :
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.1769 O of 2OL4
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, both the learned counsel contended that the issue raised in this writ petition is squarely covered by the order dated 1 l.Og.2O23 passed by this Court in W.p.No.19467 of 2014 and therefore, the present u.rtt petttion ma.also be dismissed followirg the said order.
In view of the above submission, foliowing the order dated 11.O9.2023 passed by rhis Court in W.p.No. 19467 of 2014 and in terms thereof, this Writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any. shall stard
closed
SD/- K.SREERAMAMURTHY ASSISTANI REGISTRAR aD //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
\
To
Kj. GJP 7
HIGH COURT
DATED:14/09/2023
ORDER
WP.No.17690of 2014
I fl+ ifi $B
!
DISMISSING THE WPWITHOUTCOSTS.
(
)
,
e
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenged before the High Court should be dismissed in view of a prior order on the same issue.
The General Manager, South Central Railway
Md. Mansoor Ahmed
K. Nagaraju
G. Allabakash
The Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
