In a writ petition challenging an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal regarding retirement benefits, the High Court of Telangana considered the petition infructuous as submitted by counsel and dismissed it without costs, leaving no substantive legal proposition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t3318 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 17499 OF 2017
Between:
')
...PETITIONERS
AND
\
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of a WRIT OF MANDAIVIUS, declaring the Order dated 05.04.20'l 7 in Contempt Petition No.41 of 2015 in O.A.No.340 of 2012 on the file of the Sth respondent as arbilrary, illegal, unjust, violative of Articles'14 and'16 of the Constitution of lndia, violative of principles ofjudicial administration and set aside the same and consequently direct the 5th respondent to proceed with and enforce the Contempt Petition No.41 of 2015 in O.A.No.340 of 2012 without being influenced by the Order dated 07.07.2015 in WPMP No.25070 of 2015 in W.P.No.19391 ol 2015 (arising out of O.A.No.41812011) to reach its logical conclusion,
l.A. NO: 1OF 2017(WPMP. NO:21370 OF 2017l,
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend Order dated 05.04.2017 in Contempt Petition No.41 of 2015 in O.A.No.340 of 2012 on the file of the Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal Hyderabad Bench at Hyderabad.
Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI G.NARENDER RAJ
Counsel forthe Respondents No.1 to 4: SRI AJAY KUMAR KULKARNI for SRI B.NARASIMHA SARMA
Counsel forthe Respondents No.5 :
The Court made the following: ORDER
1
HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE ABI]INAND KT]MAR SHAVILI AN I) HON'BLT' SRI JUSTTCE NAN{A'-,\RAPT' ITAJESIJ\/AR RAO
W.P.No.17499 OF 20_tl
ORf)ER: /1)rrHat'lle ln -lurtit Iblunantl knt,tr .li,rt,tltt
{/hen rhe marrer is ral(en Lrp ior hearing, leamed counsel appearing for the peririonerc submirs th:rt the cause in this wnt peririon does not sun/ive for adjudication and
hence, the writ petition has becorne infrLrctuous.
Recording the said subrnission, therJ7rir petition is
dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Misceilaneous peririons, if any, pending shall stand
closed
SD/- K. aviryl,u ASSISTANT RE Grsr,RAR SECTION 8{r,".*
//TRUE COPYi/
To, 1. One CC to SRI G.NARENDER RAJ, Advocate. IOPUCI 2. One CC to SRI B.NARASItvIHA SARIVA, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CD Copibs. BSK GJP
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 911012023
ORDER
i,6 STATE o
a
c'\ B ,iu\ 2$-i
.tbo
o
-tr
i oEliFnrc {
WP.No.17499 of2017
DISMISSING THEWRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
\ 2n)-<br>Tru
D.SRINIVASULU and others
UNION OF INDIA
BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED
THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER TELECOM, A.P.CIRCLE
THE SENIOR GENERAL MANAGER (PERSONAL)
HON'BLE CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, HYDERABAD BENCH
ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
