This appellate order dismissed Writ Appeal No. 717 of 2004 as infructuous after it was informed that the underlying cause of action no longer survives, thereby rendering the appeal futile.
Writ Appeal No. 717 of 2004 dismissed as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3318 I
HIGH COURTFOR THESTATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY,THEEIGHTEENTHDAYOF OCTOBER TWO THOUSANDANDTWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICEABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWARRAO
WRIT APPEAL NO: 717 OF 2004
writ Appeal underclause 15 of the LettersPatent preferred against the orderdated 25 02.2023in WPNo.25580 of 2003 on the file of the High Court
Between:
CoromandelFertilisersLimited,Coromandel.House" 1-2-10' Sardar^P-atel nora, s"irno"rao.J-_sooiioi,Representedby rts chief Financial officer [/lr. P. Nagaraja ..AppELLANTrpETlloNER
AND
5 it; C;;;rrslCretarv' Coromandel FertilrsersEmploveesUnion'
t.A. NO: 1 0F2004(wA MP. NO:1321oF 2004)
Petrtion underSection 151CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in
the affidavit filedin supportof the petition, the HighCourt may be pleasedto stay of all furtherproieedings pursuantto the lmpugned referencebefore the Learned RespondentNo.4,thecharimanlndustrialTribunal-lHyderabad'videG'ORt' No.1 958dt. Oct08,2003of the RespondentNo 1 , pending disposal of theWA
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2O11(WAMP-NO: 1139-OF 20111
petition under Section t Si-CPC prayrng thatin the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filedin support of the petition,the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operationof the common judgment/order dated 0610412011passed in Writ appeal No.717 ot 2004, W.P No 5640 of 2009 and W P' No' 18598of 2010, which is underreview, pending disposalof the above Reviewpetition'
IA NO:1 OF2019:
Between:
"Coromandel House' 1-2-10,Sardar Patel CoromandelFertilisersLimited, Road, Secunderabad -500003, Representedby rts Chief FinancialOfficer lvlr P. Nagarajan AP PE LLANT/PETITIONER
AP PE LLANT/PETITIONER
AND
(Respondents/Respondents1 to 3 are t"t """"tt*?lf3$J?tJrs/RESpoNDENrs
Petition under section164of Writ Rulespraying that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavitfiled in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleasedTopermitthePetitioner/AppellanttoimpleadtheStateofTelanganaand the concernedAuthoritiesi.e., the Commissionerof Labour' Telangana and Deputy Commissionerof Labour, Hyderabad, Telanganaas the Proposed Respondent 6 to8 in theaboveWritAppeali e , '
l.A. NO: 2OF2O04(WAMP . NO:1456 oF 2004):
Between:
The General Secretary,CoromandelFertilisersEmplo-yeesUnion, Snharipuram, tVlalakafiuramPost, Visakhapari:TJ#3#-/RESpoNDENT No.s
AND
Petition under section151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filedin supportof the petition,the High court maybe pleased to vacate the interim ordersdt B-4-20O4in WA 717 12004
Counsel for the Appellant:SRI G. V. S. GANESH
Counsel for RespondentNos.1 to 4: GP FOR LABOUR
Counsel fr,r RespondentNo. 5: SRIP. SRIDHARRAO
The Court made thefollowing: ORDER
RI JUSTICEABH INANDI{UMAR SHAVILI THE HON'BL AND
THE HON'BL
Writ Appeal No.717 of2OO4
JUDGMENT: lPerI Io'Lhte sn hlstice AbtnlaidKtu'lrr sl@ultt)
Lcarnedcounsel lor theappeliant-s l-ras
informedthe Court that the cause in the writ appealdoes not surviveand it has become infructuous'
COSTS
AS SDI-T. SRINI R/ DEPUTYREGIS /,TRUECOPY" SECTIONOFFICER
\
To, 'rre ansana rourl 1. 2 SH}I'isl3i.5:i'ia'ie 3 4. i;iE['d:,,?.;={::". MBC BS
To,
I
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1811012023
1 qrE ST47 e
q
o
o 1 i N0\J 2[23
o!
D SDAt{l?
a=:--- -.
ORDER
WA.No.717 ot 2004
DISMISSING THE WRIT APPEALAS
INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS
Coromandel Fertilisers Limited
The State of Andhra Pradesh
Commissioner of Labour, Government of Andhra Pradesh
Coromandel Fertilisers Employees Union, General Secretary
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
Nama Varapu Rajeswar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
