A single judge of the Telangana High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging police inaction under Article 226 of the Constitution for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's absence from hearings on multiple dates.
None. The petition was dismissed due to non-prosecution and absence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OFTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original J urisdiction)
[320e I
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRDDAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKURSUMALATHA
Between:
M/s.Kamakshi Steels(P) Ltd., Rep. by its DirectorP.V.V.SankarRao, S/o.Raghavulu, Aged about 40years, R/o. Labbipet,Vijayawada, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh-520010.
...PETITIONER
AND
..RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lnd,iapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the in-action of the Respondents in not investigating the Crime No.455 of 2017 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of fundamentalrights and consequently direct the Respondents No.3 to investigate the Crime No.455 of 2017 on the file of the Station House Officer, Khanapuram Haveli Police Station, Khammam District, Telangana State.
il2il
IA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition underSection 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto direct the 3rdRespondent to take steps to securethe plesence of the 4th Respondent for thepurposeof the investigation, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition., pending disposalof the aboveWrit Petition.
Counsetfor the Petitioner:SRl.DEVALARAJUANIL KUirlAR (NOT PRESENT) Counselfor the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR HOME
Counselfor the Respondent Nos.4 & 5: NONE APPEARED
The Courtmade the following:ORDER
HoN,BLEDT.JUSTICECHILLAKURSUMALATHA
'(RITPETITION No.17158 of 2o18
QRDER:
This writPetition is filed for the following substantive
relief:
'....toissue aWrit Order or Directionmore oarticularlyone in the nature of writ of Mandamus i""i"ri"gthe in-action of the Respondents in not i"*"tigitingthg _crim. ry1455 of 2Ol7 as illegal arbitrary "',d,,iol"tion of fundamentalrights and direct the -RespondentsNo 3to "o"""qri"ntly investigatethe crime No 455 of 2OL7 on the file of the StaiionHouse OfficerKhanapuramHave-li Police Siati,onKhammam District Telangana State'"
No representationon petitioner's side on call. There
was no representationeven on L7.O2.2O23.Though, the matter islisted underthe caption "for dismissal"on this day, yet thereis no representation'
Hence,the Writ Petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution.
As a sequel,miscellaneous petitions pending,if any,
shall standclosed'
SD/. T, JAYASREE .ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
/TRUECOPY// SECTION OFFICER
\
To..l.oneCCtoSRl-PEy^LlRflJUAN|LKUMARAdvocatetoPUC] 2. TwoCCs to"e e loiH.om",High-Courtfor the State of Telanganaat HvJeia-nad' touTl
CHR. cJP^_--
I /
HIGH COURT
DATED i2310212023
ORDER
W.P.No.17158 of 2018
i: ST,A. ,t
I
1 [ fiPfl 2s8
DISMISSING THE WRITPETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
l : ! I I I
Su)
6
[:
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition can be allowed in the absence of representation from the petitioner on two occasions.
Whether the police inaction regarding Crime No. 455 of 2017 warrants issuance of a writ of mandamus.
Ms. Kamakshi Steels (P) Ltd., Rep. by its Director P.V.V.SankarRao
The State of Telangana
The Superintendent of Police, Khammam District
The Station House Officer, Khanapuram Haveli Police Station
T.Ramprasad
B.Daram Singh
DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
