Court dismissed criminal petition for quashing proceedings under Section 482 CrPC. Found prima facie material in record against petitioners; no grounds to exercise inherent jurisdiction.
Criminal Petition No.6599 of 2019 stands dismissed and miscellaneous petitions, if any, are closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[320s ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6599 OF 2019
Between:
...Petitioners
AND
... Respondents
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtmay be pleased to quash the proceedings against thepetitioners in Spl. S.C.No.5of 2018 on the file of Vl Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge Court, Secunderabad.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the [Vlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may
be pleased to stay all further proceedings in Spl. S.C.No.5 of 11018 on the file of Vl Additional Metropol tan Sessions Judge Court, Secunrlerabrr:.
This Petition c( ming on for hearing, upon perusrng the, Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon heanng the argumr;-ls of Sri Thakur Nitender Singh, Aclvor ate for the Petitioners and the Additional [)ub tc Prosecutor on behalf of the Resp rndent No.1 and of Sri J. Venu Gopal Re,r.ldy, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the f,rllowing: ORDER
HON,BLE DT..IUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.65 99 of 2OL9
ORDER:
2
DT.C,sL,J CtLP.No.6599 of20l9
Rupees Tlr.c lalhs more. On that, the 2.d res p,r1n61snt issued a legal noti( e. The 2n,r petitioner gave replv t; the said legal notice. Le ter, the 2"d respondent filed a civil suit ald obtained ir terim relief. On that, the petitioners gave a complaint. e gainst the 2nd respondent basing c n which a case was registe'ed against him. While so, on 14.'1t7.2015, whiie the 2n(r rcsponclent and his wife were going t:, a l.empie and while they ,x,,r:rr: proceeding ir-r a car io front c,1 the house of the petil-ior ers, the petitioners abused the 2n I respondent in the name of his caste and the sarne was w.r_nessed by the persons pr scnt there.
3
D|-CSLJ OLP.No.6599 of20l9
li I
I \
4
DtCSL.J CrLP.i0.6:99 of 2019
I
closed
//TRUE COPY//
SD/. V.KAVITHA ASSII}TANT REGISTRAR '.i, SECTION OFFICER
To,
QEl
HIGH COURT
DATED:2210212023
ORDER
CRLP.No.659, of 2019
, -t::: ::=<br>z{--\r: r; A'i (
o7:.
o
co) 01!1ir t:'l
i1
...
DISMISSING THE CRL.P
<vt
{
)-
s -.-.>_
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners have cause to file a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to quash the proceedings against them.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sukka Srinivas Rao
Sukka Sunitha
The State of Telangana
Paga Rajeshwara Rao
Dr. Justice Chillakur Sumalatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
