Special Original Petitioner challenged an eviction order via a writ petition and applications for stay/status quo. The court held the writ petition's cause no longer survives for adjudication and dismissed it as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3300 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: 19913 OF 2017
Between:
Kambampati Chandrashekar Rao, S/o Venkateswarlu, Age 55 years, Occ Agriculture Rl/o Chinthonichilaka H/o Gagaram Village Tekulapalli Mandal, Bhadradri-Kothagudem Dist'
AND
...pETrroNER
...RES..NDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction preferably writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not passing appropriate orders either on the stay petition or on the appeal itself filed on 3-6-2017 filed aEainst the order of eviction passed by the 3'd respondent dt. 19-5-2017 in LTR. Case No. 6/2016/Tkp as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of principles of naturaljustice and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose of th€ staypetitkrn or the appeal itself within a reasonable time and further direct the respondents 2to4 or their subordinate staff not to disposses the petitioner from the land inpetitioner in continuous possession and enjr:yment of the land in Sy.NO.3O3l2l44lA1 lo an extent of Ac. 3-13 situated at Gangaram Village, Tekulapalli Mandal of thadradriKothagudem Dist pending disposal of the appeal on the file of the 2nd respondent
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 24352OF 2017)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay the dispossession of the petitioner from the land in petitioner in continuous possession and enjoyment of the land in Sy. No.303/21441A1 to an extent of Ac.313 situated at Gangaram Village, Tekulapalli lMandal of Bhadradri-Kothagudem Dist., pending disposal of the writ petition.
.A. NO: 2OF 2017 WPMP. NO:35082 OF 2017
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim order of status quo, which was granted on 20-6-2017 for a period of two weeks, till the disposal of Writ Petition in the interest of justice
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M. M. M. SRINIVASA RAO
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1to4: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE
Counsel for the Respondent No.s: None Appeared
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAXA
WRIT PETITION No.t99r3 0F 2017
ORDER:
. l,earned Government pleader for the respondents submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the relief sought in the urit petition has become infructuous.
dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any,
shall stald closed.
SD/. K. AMMAJI ASSISTANT GI
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. Two CCs to GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE ,High Cou( for the State of Telanqana, at Hyderabad [OUTI 2. o;;'ic 6' Siiiin.M.-M. shtrutVnsnRAo, AdvocatetoPUCl
GJP
i
HIGH COURT
DATED:2211212023
ORDER
o_l.< 2 6 FtB 2021 s(I
* {'
UEstrf c.'<br>
WP.No.19913 of 2017
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTOUS WITHOUT COSTS
b
W
Kambampati Chandrashekar Rao
The State of Telangana
Nagesh Bheemapa
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
