High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking regularization of land acquisition for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear despite a final listing for dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
SATURDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 16065 OF 2008
Between:
Sri Nazimuddin Farooqui, S/o. Late K.M Farooqui, aged about 48yeasrs, Occ: Business, Rlo. 8-2-6081111/4,"Farhat Manzil", Road No.10, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad.
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Rule Nisi Calling for the records leading upto and inclusive of the passing of the impugned order or by the 1st respondent inMemo No.65701/UC.ll(3)lo7-1 d1.28-2-2OOB rejecting theproposals of regularizationin terms of G.O Ms.No.455 Revenue(UC.ll)Dept.dt.29-7 -2002 the consequential Orders passed by the 2nd respondent in itsproceedings No.E2l4551284103 dt.2-4-2OOB directing refund of the amount as being not only contraryto the G.O.Ms.No.455 Revenue(UC.ll) Dept dt.29-7-2002 the report submittedby Dy.Director Survey and Lands Records Hyderabad dt.29-01-2008 stating thatthe land in recorded as Basheerunissa Begum Private land andquash the sameby issuing an appropriate writ order or direction moreparticularly in thenature of Certiorari holding that the petitioner is entitle for the benefit of G.O.MsNo.455
Revenue(UC.ll) Dept dt.29-7-2OO2 and the consequential orderpassed by the 2nd respondent in proceedings No.E2l455/28 4lO3 dt2-4-2o08.
LA,NAI OF 2008(WPMP. NO: 20815 OF2008)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the in Memo No.65701/UC.ll(3y07-1 dt.28-2-2OOB rejecting the proposals of regularization in terms of G.O [vls.No.455 Revenue (UC.ll) Dept-dt.29-7-2OO2 the consequential Orders passed by the 2nd respondent in its proceedings No.E2l455/2841O3 dt.2-4-2008 directing refund of the amount.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.MEHDI HUSSAIN (NOT PRESENT)
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICEJ. SREENTVASRAO
Writ Petition No.16O65of 2OO8
ORDER:
When the matterwas taken up for hearing on 01.12.2023, there was norepresentationon behalf of the petitioner and the matterwas posted to 11.12.2023. When the matter waslisted on14-12-2023,there was no representation on behalfof the petitioner.To give a hna-l opportunity, the matterwas posted to 16.12-2023under the caption "For Dismissal".
Pending miscellaneouspetitions,if aly,shall
stand closed.
SD/-K.AMMAJI ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTIONOFFICER
To,
One CC toSRI M.MEHDI HUSSAIN' Advocate[OPUC]
2 Two CCs toGP FOR REVENUE' High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]
3 Two CD CoPies
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1611212023
ORDER
WP.No.16065 of 2008
_-.rq
1\1 6 5 14?-6-
(t
ctro I B ,ifN 2[2[ a
)-
! +
.---..-
DlSMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
FOR NON.PROSECUTION,
WITHOUT COSTS
Sri Nazimuddin Farooqui
The State of A.P
J. Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
