Dismissed

Fisheries Co-operative Society, v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal

Telangana HC16 Nov 2023WP/14895/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court considered a writ petition challenging an order by the A.P. Cooperative Tribunal and two miscellaneous petitions for stay and extraction of fish. Noting the petitioner's submission that the cause did not survive for adjudication, the Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous without costs and closed remaining miscellaneous petitions.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous. Stay and miscellaneous petitions closed. No costs.

Fisheries Co-operative Society, Vs The Government of… — Cooperative Societies | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

I^3303l

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 14895 OF 2014

¶7

Between:

¶8

Fisheries Co-operative Society, (FCS) Narsingbatla Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District, rep. by its Vice President, Ambati Shivaiah, S/o. Pedda Mallaiah, Age 33 years, Occ: Fishermen / Vice President Fisheries Cooperative Society, (FCS) Narsingbatla Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal, Secretary,^(Co- operative) Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶12

2 The A.P. Cooperative Tribunal, rep. by it's Regislrar, 7th Floor, Chandravihar, Hyderabad.

¶13

The Election Authority cum District Collector, Nalgonda District.

¶14

The Election Officer (A. Laxminarsu), Sub Divisional Co-Operative Officer, Nalgonda City and District.

¶15

Gundu Jaggaiah, S/o. Sri Ramulu , age 42^years, Occ Ex-President^Fisheries Co-operative Society (FCS) Narsingbatla Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District.

¶16

Gundu Sailu, S/o. Buchaiah, age 64^years, Occ:Fishermen^{/ Member,} R/o. Narsingbatla Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District.

¶17

...RESPONDENTS

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of^{lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High^Courtmaybe pleased to issue writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating the O.P.NO.1^{11 of 2011 on the file} of the 2d respondent and consequentially set aside^{the order passedin} O.P.No.111 ol 2011, dated 05.05.2014 by the^{A.P.Cooperative Tribunal,} Hyderabad as conlrary to law.

¶19

¶20

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014( WPMP. NO: 144840F 2014

¶21

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings of the order passed in O.p.No.. 1 1 of 2011, dated 05.05.2014 by the A.P. Cooperative Tribunal, Hyderabad till pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶22

l.A. NO: 1 OF 201S(WPMP. NO:169 81 0F 2015)

¶23

Petition under Section 151 cPC praying that in the circurnstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court nray be pleased to permit the Narsingbatla Fisheries Co-Operative Society memb,ers to extract the fish lying in the tank in the interest of justice.

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SREENIVASA RAO RAVULAPATI

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: cP FOR FISHERIES

¶26

Counsel forthe Respondent No.2 to 5: NONE APPEARED

¶27

Counsel forthe Respondent No.6: SRI V. HARI HARAN

¶28

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶29

i l I I I I I

¶30

IION'BLE SRT JUSTICE J. SREEI{TVAS RAO

¶31

WRIT PDTITION No. 14895 of 2Ol4

¶32

ORDER:

¶33

When the rnatter is taken up for hearing, Sri Ravulapati Sreenivasa Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the cause in the Writ petition does not survive for adjudication,

¶34

Recording the above submission, the Writ petition

¶35

is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

¶36

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if

¶37

any, shall stand closed.

¶38

SD/- K. AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGIS'RAR //TRUE COPY// ry, SECTION OFFICER

¶39

To,

¶40

TJ SB

¶41

1 . One CC to Sri Sreenivasa Rao Ravulapati, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Fisheries, High Court for the State bf Telahgana, at Hyderabad [OUT] 3. One CC to Sri V. Hari Haran, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies

(

l i 1 I i li ii I

HIGH COURT

DATED:1 611112023

ORDER

t\E s TArG
o
( t
q
Jo 0 U D Et 10?3 c'
(>4
* {
, DEs Pn C

¶48

WP.No.14895 of 2014

¶49

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS

¶50

WITHOUT COSTS.

¶51

Fisheries Co-operative Society, v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Fisheries Co-operative Society, v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R. Vamshavardhan Rao Vs The Chief Executive Officer

P.Raju Vs The District Collector

Rapolu Datta Ganesh, Nalgonda Dist. Vs Commr. and Director of Handlooms A.P. Hyd and 2 Others

K.Vinayalka Lakshmi, Vs Prl.Secy., Mines and Geology, Dept., Hyd., and 3 Others

The Kuravi Gram Panchayat, Vs Bukya Ramu

M/ s Laxmi Narsimha Industries Vs State of Telangana