Dismissed

Andhra Pradesh Primary Teachers Association, v. the Government of a.P., and Ano.

Telangana HC12 Apr 2023WP/14287/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 and a Section 151 CPC application as infructuous, noting the matter relates to 2009 and respondents asserted the petition lost substance but granted liberty to approach if cause of action survives.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to approach the court if the cause of action survives.

Andhra Pradesh Primary Teachers… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^321s 1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTTCE P. MADHAVI DEVI

¶6

WRIT PETITTON NO:142 87 0F 2009

¶7

Between:

¶8

Andhra Pradesh Primary Teachers Association. Reo bv its President, T.Saibaba, S/o. Laxmaiah, 45 yrs, R:/o. O:Z-SOb, [Jew Bhoiguda, Secunderabad.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

'1. The Government Of A.p., Fep_by^its principal Secretary, General Administration Department, A.p.'secretaridt euitOingi, ijyd;;"b;l].

¶12

Sri Syed ShoukatAli, No. 1-4-945, Janapriya Abords, Gandhinagar, Hyderabad

¶13

...RESPONDENTS

¶14

Petition under Article 226 ot the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ or order particularly writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the Memo No.84597/s.w.l-Azt2oo7-s Dated 16,6.2009 as void and consequently direct the respondent No.1 herein to consider the representations of the petitioner

¶15

l.A. NO: 1 OF 200^g(WPMP. NO:18727 OF 2009)

¶16

Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents No.1 and his sub-ordinate officers to consider the representations made by the petitioner in accordance with law pending the disposal of the W.P.No. of 2009

¶17

i i

¶18

l.A. NO: 1 OF 201O(WV MP. NO: 4674OF 20101

¶19

Between:

¶20

Sri Syed Shoukat Ali, S/o. not known, Aged Major, Rl/o. 1-4-945, Janapriya Abords, Gandhinagar, Hyderabad

¶21

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT No.2

¶22

AND

¶23

1 Andhra Pradesh Primary Teachers Association, Rep President, T.Saibaba, S/o Laxmaiah, 45 yrs, R/o. 6-2-505,^by New^its Bhoiguda, Secunderabad.

¶24

...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER

¶25

The Government Of A.P., Rep by its Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, A.P. Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

¶26

...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶27

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim order dated 7th July, 2009 in WPMP No. 18727 of 2009 in WP No. 14287 of 2009

¶28

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B. VEERABHADRA RAO

¶29

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

¶30

Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: SRI V. HARI HARAN

¶31

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶32

I I I l l I

¶33

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P. MADHAVI DEVI

¶34

WRIT PETITION N0.14287 0F 2009

¶35

ORDER

¶36

There is no representation for the respondents in the forenoon as well as in the post-lunch sessions. On the earlier occasion, leamed counsel for the respondents stated that the writ petition has become infructuous.

¶37

Since the matter is relating to the year 2009 and the respondents submitted that the writ^petition has become infructuous, this writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous giving liberty to the petitioner to approach this court ifcause of action survives.

¶38

This Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. No

¶39

order as to costs.

¶40

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this Writ petition shall

¶41

stand closed

¶42

SD/. K.SREERAMA MURTHY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//

¶43

SECTION OFFI

¶44

To,

¶45

One CC to SRI B. VEERABHADRA^RAO,Advocate IOPUC]

¶46

One CC to SRI V. HARI HARAN,^Advocate [OPUC]

¶47

Two CCs to GP FOR GENERAL^{ADMINISTRATION, High Court for the State} of Telangana. [OUT]

¶48

Two CD Copies

BN GJP {

i I

I I

I I I I

HIGH COURT

DATED:1 810412023

ORDER

1 HE STA T€
r+
t
:)
Cd 1i l.lI,J 2$23 I
o

¶58

WP.No.14287 of 2009

¶59

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS

¶60

0<sup>n -l & tf ouf* So{J

Andhra Pradesh Primary Teachers Association, v. the Government of a.P., and Ano.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Andhra Pradesh Primary Teachers Association, v. the Government of a.P., and Ano.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Adi Lakshmi Vs The State of Telangana

M/S. Siri Organic Crop Care Vs The State of Telangana and another

M/s. Sri Rama Organics Vs The State of Telangana

N.a.Panjawani Vs Central Power Distribution Company of Ap. Limited

M/s. Avi Additives (P) Ltd., Plot No.4, Vs The Secretary, Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory

M/s. Printwell, represented by its Proprietor Vs The Andhra Pradesh State Seeds Development