Disposed

M/S Narmada Constructions v. The Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana State Ltd.

Telangana HC8 Jun 2023WP/14150/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition at the admission stage by treating it as identical to a earlier judgment (W.P. No. 45829 of 2022), directing respondents to provide electricity connections without insisting on an occupancy certificate from the HMDA.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondents to provide electricity connection without insisting on an occupancy certificate from HMDA; order stands closed based on W.P. No. 45829 of 2022.

M/S Narmada Constructions Vs The Southern Power… — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[3256 ]

¶2

Betw	HIGHCOURTFOR THESTATEOFTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special OriginalJurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE EIGHTHDAY OF JUNE TWOTHOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLESRIJUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEERKUMAR WRITPETITIONNO:14150OF 2023 een:
M/s N	armadaConstructions,Rep by itsManagingpartners
1 2 AND	.A. RavinderReddy, S/o.A.Chandra Reddy,Age54 years,Occ;Business, R:/o.Block-B907,EIPL APILAApilacandipet,Hyderabad. .D.V.S.Raju, S/o.LateD.V. Krishnam Raju,Age69 years,Occ;Business, No.8-2-293182/NU65,RoadNo10, MLA,IvtPCotony,CRpF MainGate, Shaikpet,Hyderabad. ...PETITIONERS
1.	TheSouthern PowerDistribution Companyof TelanganaStateLtd,Rep.by itsChairman andManaging Directorhavingits Corporate office at6-1-50,^' MintCompound,Hyderabad 500063.
2.	TheChiefGeneral Manager,OperationMedchat ZoneTSSpDCLHyderabad
3.	TheSuperintendingEngineer,OperationHabsiguda Circle,TSSpDCL
4.	The DivisionalEngineer,Operation KeesaraDivisionTSSPDCL l
5.	TheAssistant DivisionalEngineer,OperationGhatkesar Sub-Division TSSPDCL
6.	TheAssistant Engineer,SE/O/RR EastAE OPNarapailyTSSpDCL
7.	HyderabadMetropolitanDevelopmentAuthority,Swarna Jayanthi CommercialComplex, 4th floor,Ameerpet,Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS
circu pleas WRIT conn Kofte	PetitionUnderAtlicle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe mstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHigh Court maybe edtoissuewritorderordirection morepdrticularlyone inthenatureof OFMANDAMUSdirectingtherespondents1to6toprovideetectricity ectiontotheplotNo.27admeasunng1392.24Sq,yds., situatedat mulaVillage,ChowdarigudaGramPanchayat Ghatkesar,triledchal-

¶3

Malkajgiri District and bounded by North. 100 wide road, South. Plot No. 28 and 30/wide road, East. PIot No. 22, West. Neighbours land in survey No. 882^part. Without insisting upon occupancy Ccrtrficate from the 7th respondent by holding that the refusal to^provide electric ty connection to the above referred^premises as illegal and arbitrary.

¶4

I.A.NO:1 OF 2023

¶5

Petition Under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances^stated in the affidavit filed n support of the^petition, the High^{Court may be pleasedto} direct the respondents 1 to 6 to^provide electricity^{connectionto the residential} building, to the^plot No. 27^admeasuring 1392.24 Sq,yds.,^{situated at Korremula} Village, Chowdariguda Gram Panclrayat Ghatkesar,^{Medchal-MalkaigiriDistrict} and bounded by North. 100' wide^{road; South. Plot No. 28 and 30'wideroad;} East. Plot No. 22; West. Neighbours^land in^{survey No. 882 part. Without} insisting upon occuoancy certificate^{from 7th respondentpending disposalof} main writ^petition.

¶6

Counsel for the Petitioners^: SRI.THAKUR^ROOPASINGH

¶7

Counsel for the Respondent^{Nos.1 to 6 : SRI.R.VINOD REDDY}

¶8

Counsel for the Respondent^{No.7 : Ms.D.MADHAVI, SC FOR HMDA}

¶9

The Court at the stage of admission^{made the followingORDER}

¶10

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER^KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.1415O of 2023

¶11

ORDER:

¶12

This Writ Pe[ition is hled seeking a direction to respondents No.I Lo 6 to provide electricity connection to the residential building, to plot No.27, admeasuring 1392.24 Sq. Yds. situated at Korremula Village, Chowdariguda Gram Panchayat, Ghatkesar, Medchal Malkajgiri District and bounded by North: 100' wide road; Soutl-r: Plot No.28 and 30' wide road; East: Plot No.22; West: Nciglrbours land in survey No.882 part, without insisting upon occup.rncl' Ccrrilicatc from respondent No.7 and to pass such other order or ordcrs.

¶13

Whcn the mattcr is taken up for hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the lis in the present Writ Petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court dated 23.12.2022 in W.P.No.45829 of 2O22.

¶14

Mr.R.Vinod Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for TSSPDCL appearing for rcspondents Nos. i to 6 and Ms. D.Madhavi, learned Standing Counsel for HMDA appearing for respondent No.7 did nol disputc tlrc sarcl submission.

¶15

In vit--rr ol' the szune and lor reasons alike, this Writ petition is,.rl ispc.r sccl o[ zrt t]rc zrdmission stage in terms of .the-olLr date c.l

¶16

¶17

23.12.2O22 passed in W.1,.No.45 829 of 202,2, dirccting rhc rt:spondcnts t.o provide thc pcwer suppl5, to thc prertrises ol. thc pctitioJlcr sr,rb.icc:t to t-he conrpliancc of terms and cc,nditions:r;_rd olr filrnisl.jng.tn undertaking to pr<_rduce the occupant:.y ccr.trllc;rtc fr-om respondent No.7 withirr a prescribed periocl, and il no sucl.r occupancy certificate is produccd within such period, it is operr to thc resllordents to takc appropriate actior.r in accordatrcc r'ith l;r$^'l'hr.rc shall t,e no order as to cosls.

¶18

5 'l'he olTicc is directc,:l to append a copy ol.thc orcler dalcri

¶19

23.1),.2O)2 passed in W.p,No..l5g29 of 2022 tc.., Lhrs V/rit pcriLior). Misceilarrcous petitions, if any, pen<1ing in this Wrir pcrition. s Ir al1 stanrl closcd.

¶20

//TRUE COPY//

¶21

SD/- P.Ch. NAGABHUSHAtrIBA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /v

¶22

SECTION OFFICER

¶23

¶24

The Chairman and Managing Director, Southern^{Power DistributionCompany} of Telangana State Ltd, having its Corporate office at 6-1-50,^{Mint Compound,} Hyderabad 500063.

¶25

The Chief General Manager, Operation Medchal Zone TSSPDCL^Hyderabad

¶26

The Superintending Engineer, Operation Habsiguda^{Circle,TSSPDCL}

¶27

The Divisional Engineer, Operation Keesara Division TSSPDCL

¶28

The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Operation Ghatkesar^Sub-Division TSSPDCL

¶29

The Assistant Engineer, SE/O/RR East AE OP Narapally^TSSPDCL

¶30

The Hyderabad lr,4etropolitan Development Authority, Swarna^Jayanthi Commercial Complex, 4th floor, Ameerpet, Hyderabad.

¶31

8 One CC to SRI.THAKUR ROOPA SINGH, Advocate [OPUC]

¶32

9 One CC to Ms.D II4ADHAVI, SC FOR HMDA [OPUC]

¶33

'10 One CC to SRI.R.VINOD REDDY, Advocate (OPUC)

¶34

1 1 . Two CD Copies S.A ,/ GJ?-/ '-'/

HIGH COURT

DATED:0810612023

ORDER

. l- S ;',c,; r
i+ ,jr
,. .x
1 2 I'til{ 2[23

¶39

WP.No.14150 of 2023

¶40

DISPOSING OF THE W.P

¶41

AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSTON

¶42

WITHOUT COSTS.

¶43

-iz
:
-/

M/S Narmada Constructions v. The Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana State Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Narmada Constructions v. The Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana State Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Vivekananda Educational Society Vs State of Telangana

M/s Mws- Brp v Vs The Union of India and 2 Others

Tirumalakonda Nagamani Vs The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (Sccl)

Kolapally Gayathri Devi, Vs The State of Telangana

K. Padmaja Vs Union of India

Mahajuicy Food Processing Pvt. Ltd., Vs The State Bank of India