K. Janga Chary v. Smt v Sunitha
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petitioner alleged respondent failed to remove a tea stall disobeying a 2020 order. Respondent claimed title dispute. Court held issue of title was not for Court to decide and closed the contempt case.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case is closed with a direction that the petitioner approach the appropriate forum if aggrieved.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[31671
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1541 OF 2022
Contempt Case filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to Punish the respondents herein for willfully, intentionally, wantonly and deliberately disobeying the orders of the High Court W.P.No.No. 22169 o'f 2020 dated 07l12l2O2O.
Between:
K. Janga Chary, S/o. Laxmaiah, Aged about 60 Years, Occ. Carpenter, R/o. H. No. 25-23, 25-24, 25-25, Nimmabavigadda, Near Hanumantekdi, Badhepalli Village, Jadcherla Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.
..PETITIONER
AND
Smt V. Sunitha, The Commissioner, Narayanapet Municipality, Narayanapet, District.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should impose contempt punishment for alleged non-compliance with its order dated 07.12.2020 regarding a tea stall.
Whether the Court should entertain the title dispute between the petitioner and respondent regarding the property where the tea stall is located.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K. Janga Chary
- respondent
Smt V. Sunitha
Coram
Justice A. Abhishek Reddy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/1541/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court