Petitioners sought quashing of D.V.C. No.6 of 2016 via writ petition under Article 226 and stay via Section 151 CPC. Court dismissed writ as infructuous upon counsel's submission that the underlying domestic violence case was disposed of by compromise in 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32ee ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OFTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
IMONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEE.V.VENUGOPAL
WRIT PET|TION NO.12274 0F 2016
Between:
Ii
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lheConstitution of lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filedtherewith, the High Courtmay be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order ordirection particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari callingfor the records relating to and in connection with the proceedings in D.v.c.No.6of 2016 on the file of the learned Vlll Metropolitan Magistrate at Rajendranagar,Ranga Reddy Districtand quashthe same against
rtt a#
the petitioners herein, declaring the same as an abuse of process of law and violative of rights guaranteed under part-lll of the constitution of lndia.
l.A. NO: 'l OF 20 16(WPMP. NO: 15402 oF 2016)
Petition under Section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in supy'brt of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay ,l all further proceedings"in D.V.c.No.6 of 2016 on the file of the learned Vlll tll Metropolitan Magistrate at Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District, including appearance of the petitioners, pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI V. S. R. ANJANEYALU
Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: Gp FOR HOME
counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 & 3: Gp FoR woMEN DEVELOPMENT AND CHILD WELFARE
Counsel forthe Respondent No.4: -
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V.VENUGOPAL
WRIT PEf,ITION No.L2274 OF 2016
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed seeking the followingrelief:
"....to issue an appropriate rurit, order ordirection partiatlarlg one in the nature of writ of certiorai calling forthe records relatingto and in connection uith tte proceedings in D.V.C.No.6 of 2O16 on the file ofthe leanned WII Metropolitan Magistrate atRajendronaga4 Rangareddy Distict and quash the sameagainst the petitioners lerein, declaring the same as an abuseof process of lau and uiolatiue of ightsguaranteed under Part-Lil of tte Constitution of India andposs such otler orders as this Court may deem fit in thecircum.stances of the case".
2
,.]
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending,
if any, shall stand closed.
SD/. K.AMMAJI ASSTSTANT REGTSTB^R
//TRUE COPY//
SECTI N OFFICER
To,
MP }/ GJ
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 111212023
..<br>N'
2c
i.il
()
a) <br>\ og'
ORDER
.) ,J I
WP.No.12274 ot 2016
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS r
S. Narendra Babu and others
State of Telangana
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
