Dismissed
Ch. Meenaiah, v. The Reserve Bank of India
Telangana HCWP/11921/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAO (Special…
What the court decided
AI extract
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAO (Special…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
132521
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAO (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECETVBER TWO THOUSANO EruO TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 11921 OF 2014
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution oflndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction moreparticularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriatewrit, directingthe Respondents 2 and 3 to comply with their statutory obligationsunder Circulars issued by the Respondent no.1 andprovisions containedin lndian Contract Act while conducting auction ofjewels of thepetitioners and consequentlydirect the respondents 2 and 3 forthwith toproduce all the recordsrelating toauction already conducted by them of thejewels pledged by thePetitioners and as same done in violation of the RBI Guidelines/ statutoryprovisions.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP NO: 14996 OF 20141
Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to grant stay of conducting the auction of jewels belongs to the petitioners by the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI N.V.SUBBA RAJU (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondent No.f : -
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 & 3: SRI D.V.SRINIVASA RAO
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLEMRS.]USTICE SUREPALLI NANDA Wri t n 1 2L I L4
ORDER
There was norepresentationon behalf of the
petitioners on 06.11.2023and then the matter was directed to belisted to 09.11'2023underthe caption'for
dismissal'.
There is no representationon behalf ofthe when the caseiscalled today i'e'on petitioners, 08.t2.2023.
The issuepertains to the year 2Ot4' In this writ petition, no interimorders are granted to the petitioner'
Under thesecircumstances, the Writ Petitionis
dismissed fornon-prosecution' However,there shall be no orderas tocosts.
Miscellaneouspetitions, if any, pendingin this writ
petition shall alsostandclosed-
//TRUECOPY//
SD/. C. PRAVEENKUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,5,,, SECTIONOFFICER
To,
3 Two CDCopies BSR GJP
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0811212023
16G 5TATE o
7.
o
.I,
e 11 lrN ?t,-t +:
I
i DE'-i
ORDER
WP.No.11921 of 2014
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
FOR NON.PROSECUTION,
WITHOUT COSTS
@ati*
GeA$*Klv"
Ch. Meenaiah; Ch. IVlaniraj
RBI (DNBS)
Manappuram Finance Ltd (Valapad)
Manappuram Finance Ltd (Tolichowk Branch)
SUREPALLI NANDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court