The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the non-renewal of a passport as infructuous because the departmental file relating to the applicant had been closed by the respondents themselves.
No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
132521
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 26879 OF 2014
Between:
Panchaneni Manohar Rao, S/o.Ramaiah, aged about 63years, Occ: Retd. Govt. employee, Fyo.H.No.1-7-1 154 Hunter Road, Hanamkonda, Warangal district'
...PETtaoNER
AND
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not renewing thepass port bearing No. N 931670 issued in favour of thepetrtioner on 23.03.1979 despite of application submitted by thepetrtioner on 25.06.2014 vide file No. HY12077766038914 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to renew thepass port bearing No. N. 931670 dt. 23.3.1979of thepetitioner.
.A. NO:1 F 201 WPMP. NO: 33588 OF 2014
Petition under Sectron 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may be pleasedto direct the respondents torenew thepass port bearing No. 931670dt. 23.3.1979 of the petitionerpending disposal of theabove writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A.PRABHAKARRAO
Counsel for the Respondents: SRIGADI PRAVEEN KUMAR,
DY. SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE MRS JUSTICESUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITION N o.2a79 0F20L4
ORDER:
The grievance of thepetitionerin this Writ Petitionis that the respondents are notrenewing the passportbearing No.931670, dated 23.03.1979 despitethe petitioner having submitted an applicationvide File No.HY/2077766038914.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any,pending in this Writ
Petition, shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- K.SREERAMA MURTHY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,\o.'
SECTION OFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED:0711212023
ORDER
WP.No.26879 of 2014
$E STA r€
t
O 0 3 JAti 2024 a
-|,
.a'
o s PAT C
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
G!'ob
Cr
s--r* ['*a
Panchaneni Manohar Rao
The Union of India
Regional Passport Officer
SUREPALLI NANDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
