Allowed

Sri. Kodimala Damodar Reddy v. M/s. Kiran Bricks and Bricks

Telangana HC22 Dec 2023TRCMP/466/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order allowed two transfer and stay petitions under Sections 24 and 151 of the CPC. The court transferred Arbitration Appeal No. 68 of 2019 from the Additional Chief Judge City Civil Court to the Special Commercial Court City Civil Court to be heard with connected cases.

What did the court decide?

Arbitration Appeal No. 68 of 2019 transferred from City Civil Court to Special Commercial Court City Civil Court to be tried along with C.O.P. No. 65 of 2022 and C.E.P. No. 21 of 2023.

Sri. Kodimala Damodar Reddy Vs M/s. Kiran… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA

¶5

TR.C.M.P. NO: 473 AND 466 0F 2023

¶6

Tr.C.M.P.No.473 ol 2023 :

¶7

Between:

¶8

Raigiri Ramulu Goud, S/o. Late Venkaiah Goud, aged about 59^years, Occ Nil,^Rl/o. H. No. 10- 1-218176, Chakripuram, Kushaiguda, Hyderabad- 500062

¶9

...PETITIONERYRESPONDENT NO.3

¶10

AND

¶11

Kodimala Damodar Reddy, S/o. Malla Reddy, aged about^{41 years, Occ} Business, Fl/o. 16- 21195, Peerzadig ud a, Hyderabad- 500017.

¶12

Smt. Kodimala Vanitha Reddy, W/o. Basava Reddy, Aged about^{38 years,} R/o. H. No. 3- 5- 127, Plot No. 167, Road No. 7E, Moula Ali Housing Board, Krishna Nagar colony' Hyderabad- uooooo...orralcANTS/RESpoNoENTS

¶13

M/s. Kiran Bricks and Bricks, Rep. by its Raigiri Ramulu Goud,^{S/o. Late} Venkaiah Goud, Rlio. H. No. 10- 1-218176, Chakripuram,^Kushaiguda, Hyderabad- 500062.

¶14

Kodimala Bal Reddy, S/o. Malla Reddy,^Rl/o. H. No. 5-^{21, Block 5- 1 to 5-} 52A, Mallapur, Uppal Mandal, R. R. District. Presently^Rl/o. Plot^{No.30, H. No.} 9- 60/18, SV Nagar, Road No. 2, Nagaram village, Keesara Mandal,^Medchal- Malkajgiri District, Telangana.

¶15

Raigiri Agaiah, S/o. late Venkaiah Goud,^Ri./o. Hazipur^{Village, Bommala} Ramaram Mandal, District Yadadri- Bhuvanagiri,

¶16

Raigiri Nagesh, S/o. late Venkaiah Goud, R/o. Hazipur Village,^Bommala Ramaram Mandal, District Yadadri- Bhuvanagiri.

¶17

Presently residing at H. No. 1- 10- 2812311101, Plot Nos-^10'l and^102,Sy. No. 231 , lndiranagar Colony Road No. 6, Kushaiguda, Kapra Municipality, ECIL Post, tvledchal District- 62.

¶18

(Respondent No. 3 to 6 is not necessary Parties to this petition No relief is claiming against them

¶19

..RES'.NDENTS/RES'.NDENTS

¶20

Petition Under Section 24 of lhe C.P.C. Praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed therewith,the High Court may be^{pleased toto withdraw} the AOP. No.68 of 2019 on the file of the lll Additional Chief Judge City^Civil Court at Hyderabad and transfer to the Commercial Court City^{Civil Courtat} Hyderabad to hear along with the C. O. P. No. 65 of 2022, in the^{interest of} justice.

¶21

¶22

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶23

Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in c. E. p. No. 21 of 2023 on the file of the commercial Court Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad.

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl.^{p.CHANDRAKANTH}

¶25

Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1&2 : SRI T.BALA MOHAN REDDY

¶26

TR.C.M.P.NO.466 oF 2023

¶27

Between:

¶28

1 . Sri. Kodimal, . Sri. Kodimal, Sri. Kodimal, Kodimal,^psporljrr

¶29

1 . Sri. Kodimal, . Sri. Kodimal, Sri. Kodimal, Kodimal,^psporljrr .^{Reddy, S/o. Malla Reddy, Aged about 44 years,}

¶30

occupation^partner of [ril/s. Kiian Bricks&Bricks, ilo. zo:sg8ligg, irilin". Nagar, Moula Ali, Hyderabad, Telanqana State _ 500 040.

¶31

smt. Kodimala Vanitha.Reddy, ,u(o Basava Reddy, Aged about 41 years, occupationpartner of Mis. Kiran Bricks Bricks, ny"l's-d-tzi-Frot^'liol1'zz, Road No. 7E, Moula Ali, Housing Board, Krishna f.tagaiCotony, HVOLiI-Oai ...PET|T|ONERS

¶32

AND

¶33

M/s. Kiran Bricks and Bricks, , Represented by its Managing partner Mr. [9dlmata^{Bat Reddy, Havins rls fdcrory at xrrdzipeiVilii6;,-rt;;6 "'} 5gm.qram^{Mandal, Nalgonda District, having} its iegistere? office at S_14_114, Ptot No. 75, tndira Nagar Cotony, AdHB Coiony, l'tttiri Aii, HyolriolO,'^{' '} Telangana State.

¶34

Sri. Kodimala Bar Reddy,.s/o. K. Maila Reddy, Rio. H. No. 9-60/1g, sV Naoar, Road No. 2, Nagaram Vilage, Keesara van<iit,nleOchri_rf,trrr,iisiri'di;tiii] Telangana.

¶35

Sri. Raigiri Ramulu Goud, S/o. Late Venkaiah Goud, R/o. 10-1_218176, _^{phg[rjO-ura1, Kushaiguda, Hyderabad, Telingana} State.

¶36

Raigiri Aga.iah, S/o. !a1e Venft,aiah CouO, nyo]Uaiipui'Viflage, Bommala _ E" f.r.rg f^{Mandat, yad ad ri-Bh uvanas_iriD istrici,} i;ia; gil;^{"Sl;r"." " "-'"} 5. Raigiri Nagesh, , S/o. Late v_enraian-coud,-rvo. Hazipi,ivrrrailt]bommata Ra mara m Mand a t,^yad ad ri-B h uva na g i ri oiitrici, tela irga na SAi;. F;;;;;tl, residing at H. No. 1-!0-2812311101 , plot Nos. roi iol,"Sirr"v r.r"^'iii:""' lndiranagar Cotony, Road No. 6, Kushaigudi, Xlpra vunicipZfiivl eb-f f_,po.t, Medchat District -500 062.

¶37

_S1.1|t Bqgf,.q* Rao, , Sote Arbitrator, District Sessions Judge (Retd.) H. No. Secunderabad.1 2-7 - 1 1 2 r s r 1 2. Aoa rna oo sma ns Eveiest Apirtm ents, r.r"" i "n n'e, M;itis rii,

¶38

(Party Nos. 2, 4 to 6 are not necessary parties to this petition).

¶39

...RESPONDENTS

¶40

Petition Under section 24 of the c.p.c. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith,the High court may be preased to transfer to transfer Arb. o.^p. No. 68 0f 2019 0n the fire of the ,r Addr. chief Judge, city civir Court, Hyderabad to the Special Commercial Court, City Civil Cou(, at Hyderabad, to be tied arong with cop No. 65 of 2022 and c.E.p No. 21 of 2023.

¶41

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶42

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court^{maybe pleasedto stay} all further^proceedings Arb.O.P.No. 68 of^{2019 on} the^{file of the lll Addl Chief} Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

¶43

Counsel for the Petitioners : SRl. T.BALA^{MOHAN REDDY}

¶44

Counsel forthe Respondent No.3: SRI^{P.CHANDRAKANTH}

¶45

The Court made the following: COMMON^ORDER

¶46

\ \

¶47

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA

¶48

TRANSF'ER cwIL MISCELLAN EOUS PETITION Nos. 473 & 466t2023

¶49

COMMON ORAL ORDER

¶50

These transfer petitions are filed under Sectio n 24 of the Civil Procedure Code. Tr.C.M.p.No.4 66 of 2023 is fited praying the Court to transfer Arb.O.p.No.6g of 2Ot9 pending on the file of the III Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad, to the file of the Special Commercial Court, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad, and to be tied along with C.O.p.No.65 of 2022 and C.E.P.No.21 ot 2023. Tr.C.M.p.No.473 ot 2023 is fited by respondent in Tr.C.M.p No.466 ot cC;23 seeking similar relief i.e., to transfer Arb.O.p. No.68 of 20 19 pending on the file of the III Additional Chief Judge, Ciry Civil Court, at Hyderabad, to the file of the Speciai Commercial Court, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad. to be tied along wirh C.O.p.No .65 ol 2022.

¶51

Heard Sri^{p.Chanrlrakanth,} lcarned counsel for petitioner in Tr.C.M.P.No.473 of 2023, and for respondcnt No.3 in Tr.C.M.P.No.466 of 2023, and Sri T.Bala Mohan Reddy, learned counsel for petitioners in Tr.C.M.p.No.466 of 2023, and for respondent No.2 in Tr.C.M.p.No.473 of 2023.

¶52

sl(s, J Tr.C. M.P.Nos.473^{& 466 of 2O23}

¶53

¶54

¶55

The Court^{is informed that a[1 the parties in Arb O P'No68 of} 2oTgareintendingtotransferArb.o.P.No.68of2019pendingon the fi1e of^{the III Additional Chief Judge' City Civil Court' at} Hyderabad,^{to the hle of the SpecialCommercial Court'City Civil} Court, at HYderabad

¶56

Recording^{the same,without going into the merits'the} Transfer^{Civii MiscellaneousPetitionNos 473 artd 466 of 2023 are} allowed.^{Accordingly, Arb O P No 68 of2Ol9 standstransferred} from the^{file of the III Additional Chief Judge' City Civil Court' at} Hyderabad,^{to the hle of the SpecialCornmercial Court' City Civil} Court,^{at Hyderabad, and be tied along with C O'P No '65 of 2022} and C.E.P.No^{-21 of 2023' The Court concernedis hereby directed} totransmittheentirecaseltlerelatingtoArb.o.P.No.68of2ol9, after duly^{indexed, within a period of one month from the date of} receipt^{of copy of this order' under intimationto the other side'} There shall^{be no orderas to costs}

¶57

Miscellaneous^{aPPlications'} if anY, Pending^inthese

¶58

Tr.C.M.Ps.,^{shall stand closed'}

¶59

EKHAR^RAO SD/. N. CHANDRAS ASSISTANT EEG'9TRARV

¶60

//TRUE COPY// SECTION^OFFICER

¶61

To,

¶62

I 2 3 4 5^{:ter1'mtrlfi*n-il:,xtr:r"1iile::?:3:'} Two CD^CoPies Ks/ JAK )z-

HIGH COURT

DATED:2211212023

COMMON ORDER

ii.
i; .:l
i'r:
? 1 'rit '";t+
,., -: i'.,J i

¶67

TR.C.M.P.No.473 and 466 ot 2O23

¶68

ALLOWING THE TR.C.M.P.

Sri. Kodimala Damodar Reddy v. M/s. Kiran Bricks and Bricks

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. Kodimala Damodar Reddy v. M/s. Kiran Bricks and Bricks

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M. Janardhan Reddy and another Vs P. Narsing Rao and 59 others

Smt. Kancharakuntla Jyothi Vs Kancharakuntla Trinath Reddy

Naseem Begum Vs Siddiq Ali Khan

Pammi Sreedharachary Vs Allapati Shyamala Devi

G. Rakesh Goud Vs Chilimila Rajaiah

Dhanala Peraiah Vs Dhanala Venkateswarlu