The Hon'ble Court permitted the appellant to withdraw a second appeal (SA No. 715 of 2011) outside of court, dismissing the matter as withdrawn and vacating any interim orders.
Permission to withdraw appeal accorded; appeal dismissed as withdrawn; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA
SECOND APPEAL NO: 715 OF 2011
Between:
P. Veerannapeta @ Panyala Raghupathi Reddy, S/o Rajaiah Agriculture R/o Mandapally Vilalge, Chinnakodur Mandla, Medak District.
...APPELLANT
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Appeal Under Section 100 of CPC against the Judgment and Decree dated 16-06-20'10 in O.S.No.122 of 2005 on the file of the Court of the Sernior civil Judge, Siddipet, Medak District.
SAMP. NO: 2098 OF 2011
Between:
P. Veerannapeta @ Panyala Raghupathi Reddy, S/o Rajaiah Agriculture R/o Mandapally Vilalge, Chinnakodur Mandla, Medak District.
...APPELLANT
AND
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
]/lgale thestatus quo order dt. 12-7-2011made in sAMpNo. 1604 of 201.r in sA NO.715 ot2011.
SAMP. NO:'t60zl oF 2011
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petitionl the High Court may O. pf"*"0 issue an interim injunction restraining the respondent-herein rro,n intererin! *itt my possess_ion and enjoyment of suit schedule land i.e. land in Sy.No.ltdn to qn^9xt9nt of Acres 4-20 guntas and randing sy.No.1'r9/AA to an extent of Acres 3-04 Guntas, situated at Mittapally ViflagL,'siaoipet Mandal, Medak District, pending disposal of the above SA.
Counsel for the Appellant: SRl. KIRAN REDDY MALLARAPU
Counsel for the Respondents: SRl. L. PRABHAKAR REDDY
The Court made the fotlowing: JUDGMENT
,,
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA
SECOND APPEAL NO.7I5 OF 201I
JUDGMENT:
' Learned counsel for the appellant sought permission of
this Court to withdraw this appeal stating that the matter has been settled between the parties outside the Court and to that effect letter dated 14.11.2023 has been filed before the Registry.
Pending miscellaleous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
\
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- K. SRINIVASA RAO JOrNr RFGTSIjBAR
I
SEcnoNKFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED:2011112023
!
( 1rE ATATF
2$l[ o
,l>
q sl tt$
oD
*
JUDGMENT
SA.No.715 ot 2O11
DISMISSED AS WTHDRAWN
9 Ir
2 provisions across 1 enactments
P. Veerannapeta @ Panyala Raghupathi Reddy
Gangapuram Srinivas
Gangapuram Krishna
Nayakam Mallesham
Pantham Ravinder
P. Sree Sudha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
