Disposed

The New India Assurance Company Ltd., and Another v. Elagandula Srinivas Chary and 3 Others

Telangana HC20 Nov 2023MACMA/2876/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2876 of 2013 in terms of an award made by the Lok Adalat on 09.09.2023, settling the dispute between the insurance company and claimants without costs.

What did the court decide?

The Appeal is disposed of in terms of the Award dated 09.09.2023 passed by the Lok Adalat without any order as to costs.

The New India Assurance Company Ltd., and Another Vs… — Motor Accident Claims | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³²⁰⁸ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

IVONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA

¶6

MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 2876 OF 2013

¶7

Appeal filed Under Section 173 of tt/otor Vehicles Act against the Order and decree in M.V.O.P.No.955 of 2009 dated.25-02-2O13 on the file of the Court of the Chairman [Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum- lll Additional District Judge, Warangal.

¶8

Between:

¶9

'1 . The New lndia Assurance Company Ltd Rep. by its Branch N/anager, Branch Office at H.No. 3-5-83, First Floor, Above Andhra Bank Main Branch, Osmanpura, Karimnagar Town.

¶10

The New lndia Assurance Company Ltd, Rep. by its Divisional Manager, Divisional Office at H.No. 4-5-197, Second Floor, Prodduturi Complex, Hanamkonda, Warangal.

¶11

...Appellants/Respondents No.3 & 4

¶12

AND

¶13

1 Elagandula Srinivas Chary S/o. Sambhulingam, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Meerjampet Village, Kalva Srirampur lvlandal, Karimnagar District.

¶14

2 Elagandula Sunitha, Wo. Srinivasa Chary, Occ Household, R/o. IVleerjampet Village, Kalva Srirampur lvlandal, Karimnagar District.

¶15

... Respondents/Petitioners

¶16

Deshini Raju, Sio. Sudhakar, Occ Driver of Crime Vehicle R/o. Uppal Village, Kamalapur Mandal, Karimnagar District.

¶17

Amirishetty Srinivas, S/o. Veeraswamy, Occ Onwer of the Crime Vehilce R/o. Uppal Village, Kamalapur Mandal, Karimnagar District.

¶18

... Respondents/ResPondents

¶19

: M/S. KALPANA EKBOTE Counsel for the Appellants Counsel for the Respondents No.'l & 2 : SRI J VENKATESWARA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : None appeared Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : SRI RUDRESH DESHPANDE

¶20

: JUDGMENT The Court delivered the following

¶21

¶22

THE HONOURABLE SMTJUSTICE P, SREE SUDHA

¶23

M.A.C.M.A. No. 2876 OF 2013

¶24

JUDGMENT:

¶25

On 09.09.2023, the matter was settled before the Lok Adalat held at Hyderabad and an Award was passed by the Lok Adalat.

¶26

In view of the same, the M.A.C.M.A. is disposed of in terms of the Award, dated 09.09.2023, passed by the Lok Adalat. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶27

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand

¶28

closed.

¶29

SD/- MOHD. SANAULLAH ANSARI, ASSISTANT RE ISTRAR.

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION FFICER

To,

'1. The Chairman Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum- lll Additional District Judge, Warangal (With records, if any)

¶34

One CC to M/S. KALPANA EKBOTE, Advocate [OPUC]

¶35

One CC to SRl.^J VENKATESWARA REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]

¶36

One CC to SRl. RUDRESH DESHPANDE, Advocate [OPUC]

¶37

Two CD Copies

ADK

\.^{^5}

HIGH COURT

DATED:2011112023

JUDGMENT

MACMA.No.2876 of 2013

¶44

I
THE Sr4
B 15
o
1
6l'
{
t: t) 05 i'tAR2024
zo

E-SPATCH g,!

¶45

DISPOSING OF THE MACMA IN TERMS OF THE AWARD PASSED BY LOK ADALAT WITHOUT COSTS

¶46

¶47

'/.

¶48

I '-*'J . --.ir-;::-- .i^,-r':\t(7 i ,...i :i{ BEFORE THE.LOK ADALAT H IGH COURT LEGAL:SERVICES COM,UITTEE (HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE,OF TELANGANA, HYOERABAD) tunderSeclon^{t9 ollhe LegqltervlcesAulhodtles Acr.1987 (CenkolAst)l} Date:09-9-2023

¶49

-t--__ Il*, r H

¶50

¶51

Present: 1.Hon|ble Sri Justice G.V.Seethapathy, l (FonrEr Judge oI eEtwhite Andhra Pmdesh High Court) Chairman, I t 2,Smt.T.Bata Jayasree, Advocate, \cES c Member "I'l a:','1 3.5ri Y: Bata lY\urali, Advocate, i t,i Member I I [tACL,tA.No.2876 of 201 3of 201 3201 33

¶52

I [tACL,tA.No.2876 of 201 3of 201 3201 33 (Before the Hon'bte High Court) i iii,! o\ AGAINST ; + ftr lh6 M.V.O.P.No.955 of 2009 ll: (On the fite of the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunat - I Cum - lll^- Additional District Judge : : Warangat) i I Between: ,'. 1, The New lndia Assurance Company Llmited, Rdp.by lts Branch ,vlanager, Branch Office, at H.No.3-5-83, First Floor, Above Andhr;r^gank Main Branch, Osmanpura,^(arimnagar Town. 2. The New lndia Asurance Company Ltd., Rep. by its Divisional Manager, Divisiona[ Office at H.No.4-5-197, Second Ftoor, Prodduturi Comptex, Hanamkonda' warangat' ,: , ..,,., . , :.:Appellants/ Respondent Nos.3 E 4 I laNo"^" 1. Elaganduta Srlnivas Chary, s/o:sambhutingam, lge i.rz yeari;' O.i"putionr Agrlcutture. 2. Etaganduta Suhitha, W/o.5rinivas\Chary, Age: 30^years, Occupation : Househotd, Both are residents of Meerjampet Vittage, Kawa Srirampur lvlandat, Karimnagar District. ...Respondents / Petitioners 3. Deshini Raju, S/o.Sudhakar, Age: 2J^years, Occupation: Driver of Crime Vehicte, R/o.Uppat Vitlage, Kamatapur Mandat, Karlmnagar District, 4. Amirishetty.Srinivas, S/o.Veeraswamy,-Age: 33^years, Occupation: Owner of the Crime Vehlct-e, R/o.Uppat Vittage, Kamatapur Manda(, Karimnagar Dist, .' ...Respondenb / Respondent l I I 'f"^{/h"J.i"'d'N''} .rsNsr*i I

AWARD

This is^{an appeat fitedby the APpettant/ lnsurance Company'}

\t\ tr$

$o
i,e

..-,

2.TheLearnedCounselfortheAppellant/lnsurancecomPanyrepresentedthat the lnsurance^{Company is withdrawing the appea[fitedby them'}

¶62

3.Thesaidrepresentationisrecordedandtheappeatisdismissedas withdrawn,^{confirmingthe Judgment and Decree of the Court/Tribunat} below.TheamountifanyremainingunpaidtotheCtaimant(s)shatlbe deposited by^{the lnsuranceCompanywithin one monthfrom the dateof} receipt of^{the award, atong with interest'}

¶63

On such deposit,^{the Respondents/Petitionersare Permitted to withdraw} their respective^{shares as per the aPportionmentand ordersto be made by} the Court/TribunaI^betow.

¶64

<br>

¶65

This Award^{shatt be subjectto verification of crossaPpeat/crossobjection'} if any, fited^{by the Respondents,otherwisethe partiesare at liberty to appty} for recatt of^{this Order/Award.}

¶66

6, Court^fee Paid^{on this appeat shatt be refunded'}

¶67

No costs.

¶68

Fot New I nd a s la n c€ o Ltd
EftTd /efifrtu
OULY CON6TITUTED ATTORNEY
Appellants / ResPondent Nos.3 & 4/
lnsurance ComPanY
-7 4,&Jniq"au, { -B*')
/ MEMBER
CHAIR VIAN Memse[ o
s
4
I
lhe Slatc o<br>

The New India Assurance Company Ltd., and Another v. Elagandula Srinivas Chary and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The New India Assurance Company Ltd., and Another v. Elagandula Srinivas Chary and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A. Laxman Nayak and Another Vs M/S M.M. Travels and Another

A.P.S.R.T.C., Musheerabad, Hyderabad and Another Vs M.Vijaya Laxmi and 2 Others

Uppula Anjani Prasad Vs Gourishetti Maruthi Kiran

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs J Mallesh Allias Mallesham

K. Ramchandra Chary, Vs C.S. Kumar

P.Veerannapeta , Panyala Raghupathi Reddy Vs Gangapuram Srinivas