Disposed

The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd v. Pilli Yellamma

Telangana HC21 Mar 2023MACMA/83/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 83 of 2023 was disposed of as settled. The appeal, concerning a motor accident claim, was referred to the Lok Adalat which passed an award settling the matter in toto, resulting in the disposal of the appeal without costs to parties.

What did the court decide?

The appeal was disposed of in terms of the Lok Adalat award settling the claim without costs.

The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd Vs Pilli Yellamma — Motor Accident Claims | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³²⁵⁸ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT^{FORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY^{FIRST DAY OF MARCH} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY^THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI^{JUSTICESAMBASIVARAO NAIDU}

¶6

MOTOR ACCIDENT C^{IVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 83oF 2023}

¶7

Appeal under Section^{173 of M.V.Act against the order and decree made in} o.P.No.943 0f 2015^{dated 26t04120220n the file of the court of the Motor} Accidents claims Tribunal-cum-^{lV AdditionalDistrict Judge, Ranga Reddy} District.

¶8

Between:

¶9

The Oriental lnsurance^{Co. Ltd., Rep.by its Regional Manager, O/o Black-A'} 2nd Floor, My home Tycoon,^{Greenlahds, Begumpet, Hyderabad.}

¶10

...APPELLANT/RESPT.No.3

¶11

AND

¶12

'l . Pilli Yellamma, S/o. Pilli Ramulu alias Ramaiah, Aged 67 years, Occ' . . ngiicultuie labbur,^{Rl/o.H.No. 8-6-641} ,^{Sai Nam Nagar colony, BN Reddy} . Nt6gar, RR Districi, Presently^{residingat Anumula Village, AnumulaMandal,} Nalgonda District.

¶13

...RESPONDENT/CLAIMANT

¶14

Burka Venkanna, S/o.^{B. Ramachandru, Aged major, Occ' Auto Owner, Ryo'} - ff .No. 35/46'1, Prakash Nagar, Mirlyalaguda Town, Nalgonda D]strict' -. g. k. tiiiatr, S/o. K. China Veit<ataiarr, Aged 45 Iears, Occ. Auto Driver, R/o' ft.ruo. aS, New Prakash Nagar,^{Miriyalaguda Town, Nalgonda District'} (R-3 Not Necessary PartY)

¶15

...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶16

Counsel for the Appellant:^{SRI N.S.BHASKARARAO} Counsel for the Respondent^{No.1: SRIVENKAT REDDY KODUMURY}

¶17

The Court made the following:^JUDGMENT

¶18

¶19

THE HON BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMBASTVA RII,I) 1161P9

¶20

M.A.C.M.A.No.83 OF 2023

¶21

JUDGMENI:

¶22

Durrnl,^,.he pt:nclenc1, ol the appeal, the r.tatrer was

¶23

referred to I t€ Lok Adalat, and the same was s(,rtle,1 belbre

¶24

the Lok A<la a.-. vide Award dated 11.O2.2C)23.

¶25

Accc,rc ir gly, the MACMA is disposed of, i r terms cf

¶26

lht: arvard ir tssed by the L<-rk Ada_lat. No ot der €:j to costs.

¶27

Ccnsr. 1uent1y, miscellaneous peritior-r;, tf any,

¶28

pending, in his appeal shall stand closed.

¶29

SD/- MOHD. SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSII;TANT (bREGISTRAR

,TRUE COPY//

S=C-flON OFFICER

The tVlotor Acc le'nts Claims^{Tribuhal-cum- lV Additionalllirdricrt Judge,} Ranga Reddy^{I )is'trict.}

¶34

One CC to SRI N.S BHASKARA^RAO,Advocate [OPUC]

¶35

One CC to SR VENKAT^{REDDY KODUNIURY' Advocati)} []PJCI

¶36

Two CD Copie;

¶37

(Along with a :opy of the Award)

PSK

HIGH COURT

DATED:21 103t2023

JUDGMENT

MACMA.No"83 of 2023

1 =-
4)1
o \ ,./r' - . i.:. i 0 ,ltl ',1 2tl'.3 - ,.i ,1
-',1
/,, 'i' i'

¶45

DISPOSING CIF: THE MACMA IN TERMS OF THE AWARD WITHOUT COS-TS. fi'

¶46

BEFORE THE^{LOK ADALAT} HIGH COURT LEGAL^{SERVICESCOMMITTEE}

¶47

(HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OFlELANGANA,HYDERABAD}} [Under^{SeclionI9 of the Legol ServicesAuthorities Act,I 987 (Cenhol Act)l}

¶48

Date: 11'07-2023

¶49

Present:1 . Hon'bte^{Smt. Justice G. AnupamaChakravarthy'}

¶50

(Judge, High Court for the^{State of Tetangana)} Chairman

¶51

. ,'.1-=:::::... Chairman
l:i..;g::',11;;;;r. 2. Sri Sodumu Nagesh Reddy, Advocate,
,,':. Membei-
rl.' l. l , 3. Smt.D.Madhavi, Advocate,
' t-
,i ,l ' Member
MACMA. No.83 of 2023
\' ]r','..
\1. rrl.l;,,.-4, -\ , :.:/, '.-) (Before the Hon'ble High Court)
- -:r-' AGAINST
MVO P.No.943 of 2O15
(On the fite of the Motor Accidents Ctaims Tribunat-cum-lV A dditionaI District
Judge: Ranga ReddY District)

¶52

BETWEEN:-

¶53

The Orientat lnsurance^{Co. Ltd-,Rep.by its Regional Manager,} O/o. Btock-A,^{2ndFloor, My home Tycoon,Greentands,} Begumpet, Hyderabad.

¶54

... Appe llant/Respt-^l'1o.3

¶55

AND

¶56

Pitti Yettamma, 5/o.^{Pitti Ramutuatias Ramaiah,} aged 67^years, Occ:^{Agricutture labour,} R/o.H.No. 8-6-641 ,Sai^{Nam Nagar Cotony,} BN Reddy,Nagar,^{RR District,}

¶57

Presentty ,"riding at^{Anumaita Vittage, Anumuta Mandal,NatgondaDistrict'}

¶58

...ResPonde^{nt/C lai m a nt}

¶59

Burka Venkanna, 5/o.^{B.Ramachandru,Agedmajor,} Occ: Auto Owner,^{R/o. H.No.35/461} ,^{Prakash Nagar,} Miriyataguda Town,^{Nalgonda District.}

¶60

K. ltaiah, S/o.^{K.ChinaVenkataiah, Aged 45 years,} Occ: Auto Driver,^{R/o. H.No.35, New Prakash Nagar,} Miriyataguda Town,^{NatgondaDistrict.}

¶61

(R-3 not necessary Party)

¶62

...ResPondents/ResPondents

¶63

Counsel for^{Appettant/ lnsurance Company : Sri N'S'Bhasker Rao' Advocate} Counset for^{Respondent/Ctaimant} : Sri K Venkat^{Reddy' Advocate}

¶64

This appeat having^{beenreferredfor setttem;ntbeforethis Lok Adatatand after} hearing the Learned^{Counsel for the parties and also the parties' the fottowing awardis} passed:

's H JA^w R|11AqI\t)

::8

AWARD

Compensatronav,,ri,led bytheTribunal	Rs.20,31 ,227/^.(Rupe,.:,lwentylakhst thousandtwohunrirr,dandtwenty-si:len togetherwithpropo-tion,ltecostsandinterest 7.594perannurnfrorrthedateof petition.
CompensationAw,rrlecl (SetttementReactecl) intheLokAdatat. I<br>rl ".. ,,i: za. ":^.. l:-;)- ll^,: llfti^,. tl I \rlt<sup>i..t' t:,.,^'..- :::.1. (	Boththepartiesl)res€,1t.rndthe matterissettled beforetheLokAdatatT-heAppettant/lnsurance Companyhasaqleecitopayanamountof Rs.30,02,251l. (Rup,:e;Thirtytakhstwothousand twohundredandfifty.on,: onty)towardsfuttand finalsetttementaqirnst:hedecretalamountof Rs.20,31 ,227/-withcosts [email protected]%per annumandtheRe:ponclent/Ctaimanthasatso agreedtorecr:ivetresaid amount towardsfutl andfinaIsett[ement:fhis ctaim. ThelnsuranceCornp tnyshatldepos.itthesettted amountwithintwo t:l)m()nthsfrom the dateof receiptofcopyofl\v/ar(J,afterdeductingthe amountthatwasclepc,s;teclifany.lnthe eventof defauttordetayinrtakingsuchdeposit,the amountpayabteshal[:arr-yinterestat12%per annumfromthe datec,{de,ault.
ApportiontnentolC;ntpensation, ifan
Additional Directior{r;):

¶70

The Ap;:er .arrt is entitled to the refund of court Fe. paid in this appeat.

¶71

The arncu lt atready cieposrted by the lnsurance Corr,any if any, shatt be givelt crec lt to.

¶72

The Resp< n<lent/Claimant is permitted to withdr:r,,v th,: sn11.a amount soon afte. deposit by the Insurance Company.

¶73

rn token o consent for the above setttement and avvrrrd, the parties and their counsel har.e si gned this award in our presence.

¶74

ln l.erms o t he compromise arrived at betweerl the parties, this case

¶75

s tands disposecl of.

¶76

\ -.^{p,^)l. w} \Q-ortp.r- l.\

¶77

!v.-.:::,

¶78

ResPon dent (s)
n (s)
\ --- l,2Pett
lb0
1 o
1p
{!o Qjs
,,./
0il dtra vA €3 v*6
qo
LP
<\G
rcr r rP- vnlb 6ruuw-
(o1 '
 a'1.
S{ &\L
fu,e
fi\b *hry*
Counsel for the ResPondent (s)
(s)
i for i.. - '\oPetlant
L

¶79

Qt-wc\c^\L- fu\EMBER

¶80

-> V^.Ll^"-u)
MEMBER

¶81

6.1.-',:-r(AN
.,,2 '.''..,.-:. I
t
t 6f 'lhg qommittee)
\1(sea

The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd v. Pilli Yellamma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd v. Pilli Yellamma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr Chandra Mouli Vs K Suguna

Smt. a. Taramma and 2 others Vs Smt. a. Manjulaand 3 others

Sri. Cherukupally Prabhakar Vs Smt. Cherukupally Santhoshini

Y.Babu Guru Vs Y.Jagannadham and 2 others

M/s. Addsun Health Care Vs Bion Therapeutics India Private Limited

Maloth Mangya and another Vs Maloth Balaji