Disposed

The United India Insurance Company , Warangal Dist v. Meka Srisailam , Warangal Dist and 3 Others

Telangana HC19 Jul 2023MACMA/1402/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of the Motor Accident Claims Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1402 of 2017 in terms of a settlement reached in a Lok Adalat on 10-06-2023. The appeal for the insurance company was withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn in terms of Lok Adalat award; remaining unpaid amount directed to be paid by insurance company within one month.

The United India Insurance Company , Warangal Dist… — Motor Accident Claims | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^32s8 ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH^{COURTFORTHESTATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMBASIVARAO NAIDU

¶6

MOTOR ACCIDENT CML MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1402 oF 2017

¶7

Appeal filed under section 173 of M.V.Act., aggrieved by an order and Decree dated 30-12-2016 passed in M.V.O.P.No. 160 of 201 5 on the file of the Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-CUM-V Additional District Judge, Warangal at Jangaon.

¶8

Between:

¶9

The United lndia lnsurance Company, Rep. by its Divisional Manager, Divisional Office at H.No. 1 1/1582, P.B. No. 75, MG Road, Warangal.

¶10

...APPELLANT/RE S PON DENT NO.2

¶11

AND

¶12

Meka Srisailam, S/o. Late Balaiah, Aged 19 years, Occ: Student

¶13

Meka Srikanth, S/o. Late Balaiah, Aged 18 years, Occ: Student.

¶14

Meka Siddawa, Wio. Late Mallaiah, Aged 65 years, Occ: House hold,

¶15

RESPON DENTS/PETITIONERS

¶16

Respondent No.'1 to 3 are R/o. Gagillapur Village, Maddu Mandal, Warangal District.

¶17

Baswaraju Bhaskar, S/o. Chandraiah, Aged: Major, Occ: Owner-cum-driver Of the crime Vehcile, Rl/o. Gagillapur Village, Maddur Mandal, Warangal District.

¶18

...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶19

MACMAMP. NO:2600 OF 2017

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including execution proceedings in pursuance of the order dated: 30.12.2016 passed in O.P.No. 160 of 2015 on the file of the

¶21

¶22

Chairman-cum-V Aciditional District Judge, Warangal, Jangaor,^pending disposal of the MACMA.

¶23

Counsel for the Appellants: SRl. V VENKATARAMI REDDY

¶24

Counsel for the R:spondent No.1 to 3: SRI AJAY KUMAR M AI)ISE:TTY

¶25

Counsel for the R':spondent No.4:

¶26

The Court made tlre following: ORDER

¶27

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMBASIVA RAO NAIDU

¶28

M.A.C.M.A. No. 14O2 OF 2OL7

¶29

JUDGMENT:

¶30

During the pendency ol the appeal, the matter u,as referred to the Lok Adalat, and thc same was settled before the Lok Adalat. vide Arvard datcd 10.06.2023,

¶31

Accordinglr', this MACMA is disposed of, in terms of the award passed by thc Lok Ada-1at. No order as Lo cosLs.

¶32

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, il an1-,

¶33

pending, in this appeal shall stand closed.

¶34

SD/. MOHD. SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSISTATN REGIST

/iTRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-CuM-V Additional District Judge, Warangal at Jangaon. (With Records if any)

¶40

One CC to SRI V. VENKATARAMI REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]

¶41

One CC to SRI AJAY KUIvIAR MADISETTY, Advocate [OPUC]

¶42

Two CD Copies

¶43

Enclosing the copy Award of Lok Adalat.

¶44

prBM^)r---

¶45

HIGH COURT

¶46

DATED: 1910712023

¶47

JUDGMEN'MACMA.N c.1402 of 2017

¶48

o"G STATE o
,q
')J ill sEP ufll i)
:)
I
\ I..ii1{ ('.

¶49

DISPOSING THE MACMA

¶50

IN TERMS^()F LOK ADALAT

^<br>Ir

I l

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT

¶55

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE

¶56

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD.

¶57

lunder^{SeclionI I of lhe} tegol Seryices^{Aulhorilies Act, 1987(CenkolAct)l}

¶58

Date:10-06-2023

¶59

vlC€S)
q:
olo $rs
I Fo,
1,'? 51^.

¶60

Present:1 . Hon'ble Justice G.Sri Devi

¶61

(Former Judge of High Cou( for the state of Telangana) Chairman

¶62

Sri P.lndra Prakash, Advocate, Member

¶63

Smt. Nandita Guha, Advocate, Member

¶64

MACMA.No.14O2 of 2O17

¶65

(Before the Hon'ble High Court)

¶66

AGAINST

¶67

M.V.O.P.No.160 of 2015

¶68

(On the fite of the Chairman, A{ACT-Cum-V-Addt. District Judge, Warangat at

¶69

Jangaon)

¶70

Between:

¶71

The United lndia lnsurance Company

¶72

Rep. by its Divisional Manager,

¶73

Divisiona[ Office at H.No.1 1 /i582, P.8.No.75, MG Road, Warangat.

¶74

...AppeItant/ Responden t No.2

¶75

AND

¶76

Meka Srisaitam S/o. Late Bataiah,

¶77

Aged 19 years, Occ: Student

¶78

Meka Srikanth S/o. Late Bataiah, Aged^'lB years, Occ: Student

¶79

Meka Siddawa W/o. Late Matlaiah, Aged 65 years, Occ: Househotd,

¶80

...Respondents/ petitioners

¶81

Respondent No.1 to 3 are Rlo. Gagittapur Vittage,

¶82

Maddu Manda[, WarangaI District.

¶83

Baswaraju Bhaskar S/o. Chandraiah,

¶84

Aged Major, Occ: Owner-cum-driver

¶85

Of the crime Vehcite, R/o. Gagittapur Vitlage,

¶86

Maddur Mandat, WarangaI District.

¶87

...Respondent/Respondent

¶88

AWARD

¶89

This is an appea[ fited by the appettant/ lnsurance Company.

dr,*wQ^"0J

) !

#irl

The Learned Counscl for the Appel.lan t / lnsurance Company reprresented that the lhsurance Company is withdrawing the appeat fited by it.

¶94

The baid representa lion is recorded and the appeal is d smissed as^rvithdrawn, confirming the^jucgment and decree of the Court/Tribura[ be [ow. The amoUnt if any renaining unpaid to the claimant(s) shatt br: prid by the lnsurance Company within one month from the date ot receipt of the award, atong with interest.

¶95

¶96

The Respondents/ f'etitioners are permitted to withdraw their respective shares as per the al)portionment and orders made by Tribuna [.

¶97

5.^'This Award sha[[ be subject to verification of cross appreat/cro:;s orjection, if any, fited by the R:spondents, otherwise the parties are at liberty to appty

¶98

lfor recatl of this Orler/Award.

¶99

iCourt fee paid on t lis appeal shat[ be refunded.

¶100

No costs.

¶101

Fc,r Unlted lndia lnsurance Co. L-td
Authorised Sig o
Appettan t / Respondent No.2
I lnsurance Com Pan
\ <br>j"e,fa, Jn , A, "1 d,wa$"
l/ )/Qt74 "2---'
CHAIRAAAN /l6,uern MEMBER
\CES C
ee
+ For the

The United India Insurance Company , Warangal Dist v. Meka Srisailam , Warangal Dist and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The United India Insurance Company , Warangal Dist v. Meka Srisailam , Warangal Dist and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

United India Insurace Co. Ltd., Hyderabad Vs Kantlam Nagamany, Guntur Dist and 4 Others

The United India Insruance Company Limited, Vijayawada. Vs Dammalapati Venkateswarlu , Venkatesh and 2 Others

Shriram Gen Ins Co. Ltd., Jaipur, Rajasthan Vs Uppula Komuramma, Warangal Dit and 5 Others

The New India Assurancecompany Limited, Hyderabad. Vs Neeradi Gangadhar and Another

The New India Assurance Company Vs S.Krishna and Anr.

Kastajeevula Sangatana Vs Hyderabad Urban Development Authority