Dismissed

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., v. Smt. Uppari Sandala Vanaja , Uppari Sandala Suneetha and 6 Ors.

Telangana HC9 Nov 2023MACMA/2612/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the Motor Accident Claims Memorial Appeal and Cross Objections after the matter was settled and an award was passed by the Lok Adalat on 09.09.2023, disposing of the appeal based on the award.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed in terms of Lok Adalat award; cross objections dismissed.

What the court decided

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Vs Smt. Uppari Sandala Vanaja , Uppari Sandala Suneetha and 6 Ors. — Telangana HC (2023) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶2

AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA

¶6

M..A.C.M.A NO: 2612 OF 2012

¶7

AND

¶8

CROSS OBJECTION No.47701 OF 2012

¶9

Appeal Under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act and Cross Objection Under 4'l Rule 22 of C.P.C. against the order and decree in fi4.V,O.P.No.500 of 2010 dated 09-04-2012 on the file of the Court of the ll Additional Diskict & Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Court), Medak at Sangareddy.

¶10

Between:

¶11

The New lndia Assurance Co. Ltd.,, Rep. by its Divisional Manager, Hyderabad

¶12

...AppellanURespondent No.2 lN Cross Objection

¶13

AND

¶14

Smt. Uppari Sandala Vanaja , @ Uppari Sandala Suneetha, Wo Uppari Sandala Nanda Kumar, Occ: Nil Rl/o Zaheerabad Town and Mandal, Dist. Medak

¶15

Mr. Sreekanth, S/o U. Sandala Kumar, Age: 14 Years, Occ: Nil , Rep. by their' mother Res. No.1 R/o Zaheerabad Town and Mandal, Dist. Medak

¶16

Kumari Shivani, D/o U. Sandala Kumar, Age: 12 Years, Occ: Nil , Rep. by their mother Res. No.1 R/o Zaheerabad Town and Mandal, Dist. Medak

¶17

Kumari Shravani, D/o U. Sandala Kumar, Age: 9 Years, Occ Nil , Rep. by their mother Res. No.2 R/o Zaheerabad Town and Mandal, Dist. Medak

¶18

Uppari Narsaiah, S/o Ananthaiah, Age: 52 Years, Occ: Nil R/o Zaheerabad Town and Mandal, Dist. Medak

¶19

Smt. Uppari Sandala Venkatamma, Age: 50 Years, Wo U. Narasaiah, Occ: Nil R/o Zaheerabad Town and Mandal, Dist. Medak

¶20

...Respondents/Petitioners in Cross Objection

¶21

Mr. Laxmikanth, S/o Suryakanth, Age- Major, Occ' Owner of Car R/o HaHikhed Village, Humnabad Tq, Bidar Diskict.

¶22

"'Respondents/Respondents

¶23

counser for the Appeilant and

¶24

Respondent No.1 in Cross Objection: Sri. KOTA SUBBA RAO

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 6 and Appellants in Cross Objection: Sri. PALLE SRIHARINATH

¶26

The Court made the following: COMMON JUDGMENT

¶27

¶28

THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA

¶29

M.A.C. .4.NO.2612⁽⁾ F 20,-2

¶30

AND

¶31

cRoss oBJECTIONS NO.477OtoF 20L2

¶32

COMMON ] UDGMENT:

¶33

The matter is settled before the Lok Adalat and consequent to the settlement, an Award has been passed by the Lok Adalat on 09.09.2023.

¶34

Accordingly, this M.A.C.M.A. is disposed of in terms of the

¶35

Award passed by the Lok Adalat.

¶36

In view of the disposal of M.A.C,M.A the Cross-Objections

¶37

are dismissed. No order as to costs.

¶38

Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

¶39

To,

¶40

//TRUE COPYII

¶41

Sd/- A.V.S. PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶42

SECTION OFFICER

¶43

¶44

rlir:r3rli,tional^{District& sessions Judse, (Fast rrack court),Medak at} 2 One CC to Sri. KOTA SUBBA RAO, Advocate tOpUCI

¶45

One CC to Sri. PALLE SRIHARINATH, Advocate [OpUC]

¶46

Two CD Copies

¶47

(Along with a copy of the award)

PSR

HIGH COURT

'1;+

DATED:0911112023

COMMON JUDGMENT

MACMA.No.2612 ot 2012 &

¶56

CROSS OBJECTTON No.47701 OF ZO12

¶57

R THE SI4
o ('r
o 04 ilAfl IiJ?4 ).
C
* D€spATC ul:O

¶58

DISPOSING OF THE MACMA No.201Zt2O12 tN TERMS OF THE AWARD AND !N VIEW OF THE DISPOSED OF MACMA THE CROSS OBJECTIONS ARE DISMISSED.

¶59

G "4* ffi,r

¶60

(Former Judgeof erstwn{le Alronra rrdu€srI I rrvr I eev ,
Chairman,
R rc€5 2. Smt.T.Bata JaYasree, Advocate'
A,tember
3.Sri Y. Bata Murali, Advocate,
Member
lnmI
rs{ tsxs
/ ,#' MACMA .No.26 12 of 2012
theState 5\ (Before the Hon'ble High Court)
AGAINST
M.V. O.P. No.500 of 2010

¶61

( On the fite of the Motor Accident Ctaims Tribunat-Cum'll Addt'

¶62

"';i;:t'&;"ttl*il'ag" ti'r'c'1 m"att at sansa Reddv)

¶63

ween

¶64

New lndia fusurance Co' Ltd',
. Oy its Oivit. Manager, HYderabad'

¶65

...Appettant/ResPondent^No'2 And

¶66

1 Smt. Uppari^{SandataVanaja@ Uppari Sandata'} , -n7 .

¶67

il;"i[; w/.ufpari^{saniataNandakumar' aged} ;' fi ;';:;^;'Nii, o. zun""'"uad^{rown and Mandar'} District Medak.

¶68

i. Mr.Sreekanth^{S/o. U'SandataNandakumar'aged.14} '' i;;, Mi";;;.t Nil', Rep' bv their mother^Resp'No'1' 3. Kumari^{ShivaniD/o.U'Sandata Nandakumar' ag€d 12} '' ?;;:;iil;;;: Nit, Rep-bv^{their mother Resp'No'l'} 4. Kumari^{ShravaniD/o'U'sandataNandakumar'aged 9} -' il;;;iil;;., xl, n"p'uv their mother Resp'No'2' 5. Uppari^{NarsaiahS/o Ananthaiah'aged 52.Yrs'} "' JiiNlt, R/o.Zaheerabad rown and Mandat' District Medak.

¶69

1. Smt.Uppari^{SandataVenkatammaW/o'U'Narasaiah'} "' #e; idi;;' occ: Nit, R/o' Zaheerabad rown and M-andat,^{DistrictMedak'} ...ResPondents^{/ Petitioners}

¶70

1. " Mr.Laxmikanth^{S/o'suryakanth' Major' Owner of Car'} Rlo.Huttlkh"d^{Vittage, Humnabadlq'} Bidar^District. Respondents^{/ ResPondents} :s:-'"'--

¶71

{

¶72

¶73

¶74

--r.;E-.:'..j:r.-*7
!
a
0
tl

¶75

¶76

This is an appeat fited by,n" *Affirnsurance company.

¶77

The Learned Counsel for the Appellant/lnsuran, rhe rnsurance company is itil.""g-ti";;;::::,iflr#y represented th

¶78

The said representati .^{j'1g,1sir,"ililI1T:"r1::"'*";lj:1,,^ffi,,uo.,withdraw} amount if any rernaininc ,nr"id i"-r^:=;.:t-.::"i/Tribunal below. Th :Trn:ti,"flilr;#1;'",.ffi^{y,1l'Hff ,}:tr':'#;1.r"?1".':,;lyl}

¶79

:ifrti+fl,:ffi^{{:*'i:lfi :':',',:'irffi;i:""iT#:::.f",e6:l:,rl}

¶80

¶81

1. Ttris Award sha( be subiecr t.\ v^-it:-_-! : to verification of crc

¶82

rt any, fited uv tn" n"r,,biIt rorreca*";;;,;,;.;ff;:il",",i"#,".;:;.#":rfr.il:[:,...f,J:Hil

¶83

Court fee paid on this appeal shall be refunded.

¶84

No costs.

¶85

,.B,5"xm{m;:ft:
ffi.
*g
Appe lanu Respon dent No.2
I Ur,ance Com

¶86

CHAIRA,IAN n:
vlc
q
of
I
)

¶87

"--.
I
ER
I
I

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., v. Smt. Uppari Sandala Vanaja , Uppari Sandala Suneetha and 6 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., v. Smt. Uppari Sandala Vanaja , Uppari Sandala Suneetha and 6 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

United India Insurance Company Limited, Secunderabad. Vs Adulla Bhaskar Reddy and Another

The Ap State Road Transport Corporation and Anr. Vs Smt.Mothiya Bai , Motya

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Suryapet Vs Vundra Madhava Reddy and Another

The Oriental Insurance Com. Ltd., Hyd Vs Smt. Azizunnisa, Medak Dist and 4 Othrs

Sant Singh Basanth Kaur Sahney Charitable Trust, Vs Dr. A.S. Gajendra Mudaliar

Srigadi Shankaraiah Vs a. Ramalinga Swamy and Anr.