Quashed

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Shaik Raheem

Telangana HC25 Jul 2023MACMA/1494/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of the Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeal as settled by the Lok Adalat on the records. The appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act was quashed upon settlement

What did the court decide?

Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1494 of 2018 disposed of in terms of Lok Adalat Award dated 10.06.2023. Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Shaik Raheem — Motor Accident Claims | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³²⁵⁸¹

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMBASIVARAO NAIDU

¶6

MOTORACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1494 OF 20't8

¶7

. Appeal filqd Ulder Section 173 of Motor Vehictes Act against the Order and decree in o.P.No. 8441201s dated 1s-2-2018 on the fite 6f the court of ihe Chairman Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-District Judge, Khammam. Between:

¶8

United lndia lnsurance Co Ltd, Rep. by its Manager, R.O, T.p.Hub, posnett Bhavan, 2nd floor, Tilak Road, Ramkoti, nyderaUaU.

¶9

...Appellant

¶10

AND

¶11

1 . Shaik Raheem, S/o. Late Janimiya, Occ: pvt. Electrician, R/o. 3_129, Kusumanchi (V and M),Khammam District.

¶12

Shaik Saleema @ Dachepalli Saritha, Wo. Satyanarayana, D/o Late Janimiya, Rlo. 1-1281A, Jami Annavaram (V),Jaggalapet (M),Krishna Dist. A.P.State.

¶13

...RespondenUPetitioner

¶14

Pasupuleti Nageswara Rao, S/o Shobhanachalam, R/o. Nuzivid (V.& M), Krishna District.

¶15

Abdul Samad, S/o Sattar, R/o 24118, Konerupet (V), Nuzvid (M), Krishna District.

¶16

...Respondents No.l & 2

¶17

lA NO: 3 OF 2018

¶18

Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including the execution proceedings if any in o.P.No 8441201s on the file of rhe Motor Accidents claims Tribunal (District Judge). At. Khammam. order dt. 15-02-2018, pending disposal of the main appeal.

¶19

Counsel for the Appellant: SRl. K S N MURTHY

¶20

Gounsel for the Respondent Nos.1& 2: Sri V CH NAIDU

¶21

Gounsel for the Respondent No.3: NONE APPEARED

¶22

Counsel for the Respondent No.4: Sri G. L NARSIMHA RAO

¶23

The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT

¶24

¶25

THE HON'BLE^{SRI JUSTICE SAMBASTVA RAO NAIDU}

¶26

M.A.C.M.A.^{No.1494oF 2018}

¶27

JUDGMENT:

¶28

During the^{pendency of the appeal' the matter was} referred to the^{Lok Adalat, and the same was settled before} the Lok^{Adalat, vide Awarddated 10'06'2023'}

¶29

Accordingly,^{this MACMAis disposed of in terms} of the award^{passedby the Lok Adalat' No order as to}

¶30

costs.

¶31

Consequently,^{miscellaneouspetitions'ifany'}

¶32

pending, in this^{appealshall stand closed'}

¶33

Sd,-A.V.S PRASAD, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY'/

SECTION OFFICER

To,

l.TheChairmanMotorAccidentClaimsTribunal-cum-DistrictJudge,'. Khammam.(WITH^{RECORDS lF ANY)}

¶38

one cc to^{sRl. K S N MURTHY Advocate[oPUC]}

¶39

One CC^{to SRl. V CH NAIDUAdvocate [OPUC]}

¶40

+. On. CC to^{Sri G.L NARSIMHARAO,AdvocatelOPucl}

¶41

Two CD CoPies - ii'r.r-cioii'ine copv oF LoK ADALAT AwARD dated 10'06'2023) SP

lN(

,tsq
.:,'r

HIGH COURT

DATED:2510712023

JUDGMENT

MACMA.N o.1494 ot²⁰¹⁸

¶48

.STAI€
a
q
loo 2? stt ?[2x o
t
t
DESPpfc

¶49

MACMA IS DISPOSED OFF

BEFORE THE.LOK ADALAT

¶54

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR THE STATE OF TEIiANGANA HYOERABAD.

¶55

;tl

¶56

lunder^Section I9 of t[.re, t ggot,sprvigisiAulhc.rlties:act, r 987: (ienkot Act)] ..:

¶57

Date:^r10i'06-2023

¶58

Present:1. Hon'ble Justice G.Sri Oeri

¶59

v
c5oc r3[s,s,'l EI
I
,,r€ State

¶60

(Former Judge of High Court for the State of Tetangana) Chairman

¶61

Sri^rP.lndra Prakash, Advocate, Member

¶62

Smt. Nandita Guha, Advocate, Member

¶63

lrlAClvlA.No;1494 of 2O18'

¶64

:.,:.

¶65

, (Before the Hon'ble High Court)

¶66

AGAINST

¶67

(on the rite or the *o,o,. o..ffit#ffifi#ffiistrict Judse) at Khammam)

¶68

Between:

¶69

M/s. United lndia lnsurance Co. Ltd., Re.b-by its Manager, R.O, T.p. Hub, posnett Bhavan, 2nd ftoor, Titak Road, Ramkoti, Hyderabadr'

¶70

...Appellant.

¶71

AND

¶72

1 Shaik Raheem, S/o. Late Janimiya, aged 36 years, pvt. Electrician, Rlo'. 3-129, Kusumanchi (V&M), khammam Dist.

¶73

2 Sh.aik.Sateema @ DachepatLi Saritha, W/o. Satyanarayana, D/o. Late Janimij7a, 28 years, house hotd, Rlo. 1-11,gtA,' Jami Annavaram (V), Jaggatapet (M), Krishna. Dist. A.p.State. )i

¶74

. . Respondent/Petitio er5

¶75

Pasuputeti la,gglwara Rao, S/o. Shqbhanachatam, aged 62years,. R/o. Nuzivid (V e M), Krishna District.

¶76

. . Respondent/ Respondent o.1

¶77

Abdut Samad, S/o. Sattar, aged 53 yehrs, R/o.24/18, Konerupet (V), Nuzvid (M), Krishna District.

¶78

...Respondent/Respondent ffo. Z

I
I
I
{
N

AWARD

This is an appeal fited by the appeltant/^{Insurance Company.}

¶83

-4 q

¶84

The Learned Counsel for the AppeLtant/^{lnsuranceCompanyrepresented that} the lnsurance Company is withdrawing^{the appeal fitedby} it.

¶85

The said representation is recorded and^{the appealis dismi5sedas withdrawn,} confirming the^judgment and decree of^{the Court/Tribuna[betow. The} amount if any remaining unpaid to^{the ctaimant(s)shatl.be paid by the} lnsurance Company within one month from the^{date of receiptof the award,} atong with interest.

¶86

The Respondents/ Petitioners are^permitted to^withdraW their^respective shares as per the apportionment and orders made by Tribunat.

¶87

This Award shatt be subject to verification^{of crossappeal/crossobjection,if '} any, fited by the Respondents, otherwise the^{parties are ht tibertyto appty} l for recatl of this Order/Award.

¶88

Court fee paid on this appdal shatl be refunded.

¶89

No costs.

¶90

¶91

For Unlted lndla rrance Co. Ltd.
Authorhed Slg ry
Appettant/
lnsurance Company
.l
w
CHAIR'fAN BER MEMBER
n
o:)T
ittee)
<)
I
lhc
LL.L"L3
tt{4, A^q;/vE ^ )

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Shaik Raheem

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Shaik Raheem

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bandaru Jagan Mohan Reddy Vs Beeram Ranga Reddy

Saroja, Mahabubnagar Dist and 3 Others Vs Sujatha, Mahabubnagar Dist and 3 Others

Panganti Laxmi Narasimha Vs Kalakonda Srinivasulu

P Rajendra Prasad Vs Alka Deshmukh

R Hari Prasad Vs Avula Pedda Obulesu

P.Manikya Vs Eslavath Chander