The High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition as infructuous. The learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the main suit was decided in favour of the respondent-plaintiff, rendering the challenge to the interim order without merit.
The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t3m0I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWENWFOURTH DAY OF FEERUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.SANTHOSH REODY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 5137 OF 2017
Petition under Anicle 227 of the Constitution of lndia, by the order dated 29-08-2017 passed in CMA.No.4 of 2017 on the file of llt Additionat District and Sessions Judge, Asifabad, Asifabad District, preferred by the order dated 20{42012 passed in l.A.No: 44 of 2O11 in O.S. No: 16 of 2011 on lhe file of the Junior Civil Judge, Chennuru, Mancherial District.
Between:
Karnakonda Srinivas S/o Pochaiah Age: 42 years, Occ: Agriculture R/o Bopparam Village, Nennel Mandal Mancherial District
...PETITIONEFYRESPONDENT/DEFENDANT
AND
Smt. Birudu Mallakka Wo Rajaiah, Age:76 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o Nennel Village and Mandal, Mancherial District.
...RESPONDENT/PETITIONERYPLAINTI FF
CRPMP. NO: 6676 0F 2017
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay the operation of the order passed in CMA.No.4/2017 dated 29-8-2017 on the file of learned lll Additional District and Sessions Judge, Asifabad, Asifabad District pending disposal of the above CRP
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. M. M. M. SRINIVASA RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: SRl. GUOI MADHUSUDHAN REDDY
The Court made the following: OROER
THE HONC URABI.E SRI JUSTICE A.SANTHOSH REDDY
crvil. rEvrsroN PETTT|oN No.st37 0F 2017
ORDER
This Civil R( v sion Pelition is filed to set oside the orde'doted 29.08 2017 pcss, ,c in CMA No.4 of 201/ (Old CMA No.l ,:f 2016) by the leornel ll A l<litionol Diskict Judge, Asifobod
Perding niscelloneous opplicolions, if ony shcll stond
closed
Sd/. B. SI.IANDRA PRAKASH ASIiI::iTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// 4-SEI]TION OFFICER
To,
VH lrt"u
HIGH COU]IT DATED:').4'0212023
ORDER
.r' .." - -. -,_ _ - -::--
,1 r\ '. i-, <br>,-..
'l: \
/':
|t:.
| ., 11 t'11\Y ?UB
CRP.No.til 17 of 2017
DISMISSIN G THE CIVIL
REVISION)ETITION AS
INFRUCT'U OUS
',2
\5 A\6
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the main suit having been decided in favour of the respondent-plaintiff, the civil revision petition challenging the interim order is infructuous.
Karnakonda Srinivas
Smt. Birudu Mallakka
A. Santhosh Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
