The High Court of Telangana dismissed a Civil Revision Petition as infructuous because the underlying Interim Application had been disposed of on merits by the trial court prior to the filing of the revision.
Dismissal of Civil Revision Petition as infructuous; closure of pending miscellaneous applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3258 ]
,/
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMBASIVARAO NAIDU
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO-: 196 OF 2021
Petition Under Section'15'1 of CPC /Article 227 constitution of lndia against the Order dated:811212020 in l.A No. 261 ol 2020 inO.S No.1O2 of2O2Oon thefile of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Alampur, Jogulamba GadwalDistrict.
Between:
S. lndrakaladhar Shetty, S/o. late S. Chalamaiah, aged about 50years, Hindu, Business, R/o. H.No.2-23, Paipadu village, Waddepallymandal, Jogulamba Gadwala District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
lA NO: 1 OF2027
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may be pleased to
t
direct the Junior Civil Judge, Alampur for, the issuance of injunction order against Respondent No.5 as ex-parte injunction order as contemplated under Order 9, Rule 6(1)(a), CPC and pass such other order or orders pending disposal of main CRP and pass.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. ATTULURU JAGADEESH KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent No.5: M/S ARSHIYA BEGUM
The Court made the following: ORDER
I I
I
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMBASTVA RAO NAIDU
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.196 OF 2O2I
ORDER:
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the petitioner/piaintiff against the docket Order dated 08.12.2O2O passed in I.A.No.261 of 2O2O in O.S.No.102 of 2O2O by iearned Junior Civil Judge, Alampur, with a prayer to revise the said order and direct the Court below to consider for issuance of notice against respondent No.5 by setting aside the ex parte ordet. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents filed a memo annexing with a photostat copy of Order dated 25.01.2023 passed in I.A.No.26 I of 2O2O in O.S.No.1O2 ot 2O2O (filed under Order XXXX, Rules 1 and 2 of C.P.C.) and submits that the mdn interlocutory application has been disposed of before the Court below and nothing survives for adjudication. Therefore, this Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous.
2
I i I
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. No costs.
\
SD/. K. VENKAIAH ASSTSTAIIREGISTRAR .rfk oFFrcER \
//TRUE COPY//
To, 1 . The JuniorCivil Judge AlampurJogulamba G.adwelDiskict' i o;;CC i;sii. Attrir,,JaqideesiKumar,Advocate [oPUc] ;. il; CC iortrl.. ni"niv, Be"gum,Advocate[OPUC]
T J
I
HIGH COURT
SSRNJ
DATED:1310312023
ORDER
1HE SI4 14:
/r
$1r
oo 1 O I'IAY TTA }
CRP.No.196 of 2021
DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVTSION PETITION AS INFRUCTIOUS
,
1 issue framed by the court
Whether this Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed on the ground of being infructuous as the underlying Interim Application was disposed of on merits before the High Court?
S. Indrakaladhar Shetty
S. Vijaya Lakshmamma
S. Satyanarayana Shetty
S. Venugopal Shetty
Anasuyamma @ Koona Padmavathi
S. Sreenivasulu Shetty
S. Sambasivarao Naidu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
