Civil Revision Petition was dismissed as infructuous by the Court upon taking on record the petitioner's submission that the relief sought had become infructuous and nothing survived for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3258 ]
IN THE HIGH COURTFORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTHDAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE SAMBASIVARAONAIDU
CIVIL REVISIO N PETITION NO: 1893 OF 2021
PetitionunderArticle22ToflheConstitutionoflndiaagainstthe order dated o7to1t202ol.A. No.2560t 2011 in o.s. No.290f 2007, on the file of the court of the lllAdditionalDistrictJudge, Ranga Reddy Districtat L.B. Nagar
Between:
| 1.AlgoniRamachandraiahGoud(Died perLRS) 2.AlgoniSaroja,Wo.Late RamachandraiahGoud, agedabout75yeargOcc:Agriculture |
|---|
| 3.AlgoniNarsimhaGoud(Diedper Lrs) |
| 4.AigoniPapaiahGoud"S/o.LateAlgontamadrandraiahGou4 agedabout55years,Occ Agriculh:re |
| 5.AlgcniPrabhuGoudS/o.LateAlgoniRamachandraiah Goud, agedabout48 years, Occ:Agriculture, |
| (PetitionersNo.2,4&5 areall R/o.Golloor Viliage Maheshwarm Mandal, |
| RangaReddyDistrict.) |
| 6.K.JyothiWo.Laxmipathi, |
| Aged about45years,Occ:Household, |
| IVo. ShamashabadVillageand Mandal,RangaReddyDistrict. |
| 7.V.SuthaKrthi(Died per Lrs) |
| 8.V. Rafu S/o V.SuthaKirthiagedabout40Yeam,(Died) |
| OccAgricultueR/oYapralVillageMalkajgiri Mandal,R-RDist. (Petitioners No.6,7&8 areR/o. ShauuhabadVillageandMandal,R.R.District) |
| 9.V.PadmaWo.Krishna,agedabout34years, Occ Household, R/oKalariguda,Secunderabad. |
| 1.0.A.ShyamalaW/o. Narsimha, Agedabout33y€ars, |
| Occ:Househol4R/o.Nagaram Village |
| MaheshwarmMandalRangaReddyDistrict. |
| 11.V.VikramS/o.SuthaKirthi,agedabout32years, |
| OccAgrioture,R/o.YapralVitlage, |
| MalkaigirimandatRanga ReddyDistrict. |
| (Petitioners No.7to11.areLR's ofSri. Jayamma,D/o.LateAlgoni |
| RamachandraiahGoud) |
| 12.L. AniaiahS/o.Ramaswamy;agedabout65years, |
| OccPensioner,IVo Palmakul Village |
| Shanshabadmandal,RangaReddyDistrict. |
| 13.L ShravankurnarS/o.Anaiah,agedabout40years, |
| Occ:Private Teacher,R/o,Golioor Village, |
ij:reshrrrr: \frr.rl:lRa-nga Reddy Diiti& 14. Meena Kumari Wo. Srinivas,. Occ: Household R/o
t,
;liilr"ifiifl :'i:+*-'#ffi
| i. | -4- | |
|---|---|---|
| ,(RespondentsNo.1 to10,areali WoGollurVillage,Maheshwar Ran8aReddyDistrict.) 11.VasagoniChandramani,D/o.LateA.Gopaiah, Wo.Anjaiah,Agedabout59Years, FJ9.633,Yapral, .Alwal,Seo:rderabad 12.L.Indrasrrlla, D/o-LateA.GoPaiah, WolAnjaiah,Agedabout55Years,. R/o RamMandirPremises,GrerlapallyVillage KhapraMr:ncipality,Ranga ReddyDistrict. 13.K.Roopamma,D/o.Late A.GoPaiah, Wo.K.Venkateshwarlu,iVo.RamMandiiPremises, C:rerlapaily Village, KhapraMunicipality, ILngaReddyDiskict. |
amMandal,) : |
|
| h | 14.Smt. K.Prabhavati, D/o.LateCiennanima, Wo.ICVenkateshwarluAgedabout47years, Oct: House-hold,IVo.12-1-17, Lalapet, Secunderabad. |
|
| 15.SmtL.t axmi,Wo.Latel.Lingarnaiali, '' Agedabout37years,Occ; Service, 15.Laxura+ S/o.Latel.Lingamaiah, Agedabout21years, 17.L.Santosh,S/o.Latel.LingamaiatL Agedabout17years, 18.L.Swathi,D/o. LateL.LingamaiatL Agedabout17years, (Respondmts No.11to18AllareR/o.Lab QuarrersNo.A-29l6,Kan llyderabad@efendants17&18areminors,represented bytheirm guardian DefendantNo.15). |
chanbagh, otherand |
|
| tioners | L9.RVeeraswami,S/o.R.Srinivas,Agedabout52years, 20.Rsr*.anth,S/o.R.Veeraswami, Agedabout24years, |
|
| itl : |
21.RRekha D/o.RVeeraswiimi,Agedabout22years, 22.R.Kavitha,D/o.RVeeraswami, Agedabout20years, 23.Kalpana,D/o.R.Veeraswdmi Agedabout18years, @eipondmtNo.19to2iareAIIIVo.NearRamalayamTempk, Hyderabad.) 24.KNarsinha GoudS/o.K.Jamnraiah Goud, |
. '' Laldarwaza, |
| ; r. |
Agedabout years,Occ:Business, .@iedper LR'sRespondentNo.25to27) 25.KJaihindGoud,S/o.K.NarsinrhaGoud, Aged about42years,Ocr:Business, |
|
| (RespondentsNo.24&25BothareR/o.H.No.3452e8 Hyderabad.) %.K.VikasGoudS/oLate Nar.simhaGoud |
,Barkanpvra, | |
| aged about55years,Occ: Business | ||
| : | 27,K.DasarthGoudS/oLate.NarsimhaGoud Agedabout50years, Occ: Business |
.-,d |
| ,- (RespondentNo.25 &27areIVo H-No.54-526131601;Barkatpura, .Responden |
|---|
| a8r.AlgoniSuvama,Wo.Late Narsimha Goud, Agedabout:55years,OccHouseHold, IVo.Goll,urVillage, Maheshwaram Mandal, RangaReddyDistrict. I |
| X,AlgoniSrujanRaiGoud,S/o.LateNarsimha Goud, |
| ABed about:42yeargOcc:Business, IVo.GollurVillage, Maheshwaram Mandal, RangaReddyDiskict. |
| 3o7.AlgoniBharathGoud,S/o.LateNarsimhaGoud, |
| Agedabout31years,Occ:Businest B/o.GollurVillageMaheshwaram Mandal, RangaReddyDistrict. |
| 91.V.RadhaWo.Vikra:+ 1 Agqdabout32years,OccHouseWife, R/o.Yapral Village,MalkajgiriManda! |
| RangaReddyDistrict. ...Respondents/?roposedPiaintifbNo.2l 3}7.VasagouniSanthoshaWo.LateRaiq |
| Agedaboutr12years,Occ:HouseWife, ' IVo.YapralVillageMalkajgiriMandal RangaReddyDistrict. |
| 337..Vasagounilayasree,D/o.Late Raju, Agedabout21years,OccStudent, IVo.Yapral Vi]lage,MalkaigiriMandal, RangaReddyDistrict. |
| 3\r'.VasagourriBhuvaneshwari,D/o.LateRaiu, Agedaboui20years, Occ:Studen! R/o.YapralVillage,MalkajgiriMandal, RangaReddyDiskict. |
| 3f,VasgouniUmaMaheshwari,D/o.lateRaju, Agedabout19years, Occ:Shrdent, IVo.Yapral Village,MalkajgiriMandal 'RangaReddyDistrict. |
| 3f.VasgouniVarun, D/o.LateRaiu, Agedabout18yea$,O€l:Shrdmt, B/o.Yapral Village,MalkaigiriMandal, |
| RangaReddyDistrict. ...Respondents/?ropoSed otrotNecessa.ryPartieq No.28ro30 Plaintiff: |
lA NO: 1 OF 202'l
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to direct l.A. No. 256 of 2011 in O.S.No.29 of 2007 on the file of the Hon'ble lll Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B. Nagar.
Counsel for the Petitioners : SRl. D MADHAVA RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
{
\
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMBASIVA RAO NAIDU
CTVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1893 OF 2O2I
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners has informed this Court that the relief sought for in this Civil
Revision Petition has become infructuous and nothing survives for adjudicatron.
Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall
stand closed. No costs.
SD/-T.JAYASREE
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// L 'u) SECTION OFFICER
To,
'I . The lll Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar
SB Bsx
HIGH COURT
DATE D: 1 510312023
o $ 1t\E ST4 14:
( ;x
O
15 llAY zUJ j J
,:,
ORDER
CRP.No.1893 of 2021
DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
Bh
r*
l, l.->
Algoni Saroja
Aigoni Papaiah Goud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
