Dismissed

Mohammed Tanweer Siddiqui v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC5 Sept 2023CRLRC/444/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, in a Criminal Revision filed before a 1361-day delay was condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, allowed the petitioner to withdraw the petition with liberty to seek other available legal remedies, subsequently dismissing the revision.

What did the court decide?

Permission accorded to withdraw the Criminal Revision with liberty to avail other remedies; CrI.C. dismissed as withdrawn.

Mohammed Tanweer Siddiqui Vs State of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

I l

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD}

¶3

TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF^SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY^THREE

¶4

:PRESENT:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI

¶6

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO:⁴⁴⁴ OF 2023

¶7

Criminal Revision Case under Sections^{397 & 401 of Cr.P.C. againstthe} Order dated 22-10-2019 made in tt/C No.13^{of 2016 on the file of the Court of the} Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate^{of First Class, Andole at Jogipet}

¶8

Between:

¶9

Mohammed Tanweer Siddiqui, S/o. Mohammed^{Raza Siddiqui, Agedabout 34} years, Occ. Pvt. Employee, Rl/o. H.No. 17- 8-421|E,^{BagaJahanAra, Yaqutpura,} Hyderabad

¶10

... Petitioner/Respondent

¶11

AND

¶12

State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public^{Prosecutor HighCourt for the State of} Telangana, at Hyderabad.

¶13

Smt. Kaneez Ayesha Sultana, W/o.^{Iri'lohammedTanveerSiddiqui, aged about} 31 years, Occ. Household, Rl/o. H.No.^{16-55, Near Golla Sangam, Jogipet} Town, Sanga Reddy District.

¶14

. Respondents/Petitioners

¶15

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶16

Petition under Section 5 of limitatlon^{Act prayingthat in the circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition,the High Court maybe pleased} to condone the delay of^{1361days in filing of the Crl.R.C against the orderdated 22-} 10-2019 in MC.No. 13 of^{2016 passedby the Junior Civil Judge-Cum-Judicial} Magistrate of I Class, Andole at Jogipet.

¶17

lA NO: 3 OF 2023

¶18

Petition under 397 (1) rlw 482 of Cr.P.C.^praying that^{in the circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of^{the petition,the High Court may be pleased} to suspend execution of the order dated 22-10-2019^{in MC.No.'13 of 2016 passedby} the Junior Civil Judge-Cum-Judicial Magistrate^{of I Class, Andole at Jogipet, pending} disposal of the main Crl.RC.

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI PULIMAMIDI^{SHASHIDHAR REDDY}

¶20

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: PUBLIC^PROSECUTOR

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

I I I I

¶23

THE HONOT]RABLE SRIJUSTICE N. TUKARAMJI CRIMINAL VI IO S N .444 oF2 23

¶24

ORDER

¶25

'Ihis Crir.ninal Revision Cese has been filecl challengine the rrrc'ler d.rrerl 22.rc.2AD in M.CNo.13 of 2Arc on the file of the .funior^(hvil Jrrdse-cLrnr-JLrclicial fuhgistrate of I C.lass, Andole at Joeiper.

¶26

tr&.. P. Shmhidher Reddy, learned counsel for the revision

¶27

;'rctitioner^pr.i1s for u.ithdrawal of rhis revision wlrh a libeny ro avail other rcmedics available under law.

¶28

Pennission is accorded.

¶29

4 Accordingl1., this Criminal Revision Gse is dismissed as

¶30

wrthdrawr u.rtl.r liLreny as prayed, for.

¶31

As a seqr-rel, miscellaneous peririons, pending if any, shall

¶32

stand closecl

¶33

Sd/. M' RAMANA^KRISHNA oEPUIIREGISTRAR. //rRUE coPY/'

¶34

oFFlcER "ec!ilPu

¶35

To, 1. The Junior^{Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate of FirstClass'Andoleat Jogipet} , ;r; ct i;^{snr puitrr'lnr"rrol sunsuto'-unnREDDY Advocate[oPUC]} 3. Two^{CCs to Public pro.u"t]tol.,ftign Courtfor the State of Telangana[OUT]'} 4 Two CD^Copies

Y'R.. . qr* kam^I

t 1

HIGH COURT DATED:0510912023

¶40

ORDER

¶41

CRLRC.No.444 of 2023

¶42

DISMISSING THE CRL.RC AS WITHDRAW

¶43

vr€ STAre oA
,at
TJ3 Yao
? N,J )-,
r,)
i
-o
* f
n
::;z

¶44

t^cd'a tr"

Mohammed Tanweer Siddiqui v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammed Tanweer Siddiqui v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jaminivalasa Chiranjeevulu Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Sunekar Reddy Ramesh Goud alias Sunekar Rao Ramesh Goud Vs The State of Telangana and another

Vempati Srinivas Vs the State of Telangana

Pogula Rajaiah Vs The State of Telangana

Mohd. Gouse Pasha Vs Sajida Parveen And Another

Mohd. Gouse Pasha Vs Baba Quadeer Ahmed and Another