Court dismissed a Criminal Revision filed under Sections 397 and 401 CrPC as infructuous, holding the cause no longer survives for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3217 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2272OF 2018
Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 and 401 of CrPC against the Order dated 17-07-2018 made in Crl.M.P.No.776 of 2017 in CC.No.27 of 2014 on the file of the court of the Principal Special Judge for CBI Cases, Hyderabad
Between:
Vempati Srinivas, S/o Vempati Gananda, Occupation: Business, R/o.Flat No.304, Srinivas Colony, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
THE STATE OF TELANGANA, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, CBl, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
lA NO: 1 OF 20'18
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in C.C.No. 27 of 2014, on the file of Principal Special Judge for CBI Cases, Hyderabad., pending disposal of the main Criminal Revision Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : Ms. BHAVANI REPRESENTING SRI. B SHANKER
Counsel for the Rispondents: (SPL PP FOR CBI )
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JI'STICE N. TUKARAMJI
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2272 OF 2018
ORDER:
This petition, under Section 397 & 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short the 'Cr.p.C), has been filed by the Accused No.B with a prayer to set aside the order dated 17.07.2018 passed in Crl.M.p.No.776 of 2OL7 in C.C.No.27 of 2014 on the file of the learnedprincipal Special Judge for CBI Cases. Hyderabad.
Heard.
MS. Bh ava n i, lea rned counse,l representing the counsel for the revision petitioner submits that the cause in the petition has become infructuous.
Having regard to the submission and as the cause in the petition does not survives for adiudication, this petition is dismissed as in fructuou s.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, are
closed.
//TRUE COP'///
Sd/. T. SRINIVAS DEPUW REGISTRAR L7t) SECTION OFFICER
To,
ADK rr- t\
HIGH COURT
DATED:0410912023
ORDER
CRLRC.No.2272 of 2018
r, . ,\ '11
it:i| .-, 1i [tI ?823
.,..-,;
DISMISSING THE CRLRC AS INFRUCTUOUS
Vempati Srinivas
The State of Telangana
N. Tukaramji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
