Revision petitioner withdrew the criminal revision case, submitting that the subject matter was compromised between the parties. The High Court recorded the withdrawal and dismissed the case.
Criminal Revision Case No. 3166 of 2017 dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32ee ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SR! JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL RE VISION CASE NO: 3166 0F 20,t7
criminal Revision case under section 397 & 4o1 of cr.p.c against the Judgment datd 2sllol2olz made in crr.Mp No.293 of 2016 in MC No.263/2013 on the file of the court of the XV Additionar District and Sessions Judge-cum- il Additional Family Judge, Kukatpalty, at Miyapur.
Between:
M.Mahendar' s/o. Lateprakash, occ Business, Fi/o.H. No.1-25-72, srinivasa nagar, Bowenpally, Secunderabad.
...REVISION PETITIONER/ RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT
ANO
CRLRCMP. NO: 5114 OF 2017
Petition under section 4g2 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of grounds of criminar'Rivision case, th; iigh e;;; may be-pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings as per the order Dated: 25.10.201r passed in crr.M.p. No. 293 of zoio in ru.c. No. zos ot zorslon G;fiG of the XV Additionar Disrrict And Sessions Judge -cum- il Additionar F;ilt J;;;;; Kukatpally at Miyapur, Ranga Reddy District.
For the Petitioner : SRI K.LAKSHM| MANOHAR, Advocate
I9rtl,9 RespondentNo.1 : SRt VIZARATHALl,ASSISTANTpUBLtC PROSECUTOR
Forthe Respondent No.2 : SRI ANJAIAH KANDULA, Advocate (NR)
The Court made the following: ORDER
,l j
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.3166 OF 2Ol7
ORDER:
!
Mr. G.Akul Reddy, Iearned counsel representing on behalf of Mr. K. Laxmi Manohar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of the case is compromised between the parties and no further orders are required in the present Revision Case. Therefore, seeks to withdraw the Criminal Revision Case. l.earned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle
Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/-M.RAMANA KRISHNA DEPUW REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// Llr)
SECTION OFFICER
Ki
\ .
HIGH COURT
DATED:271O712O23
ORDER
t:.,
:lo 1g stt N! .; ii
\ ,j
ti. '-',
CRLRC.No.3166 ol 2017
CRL.R.C. ]S DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN.
)3
25<br>
M. Mahendar
The State of Telangana
M. Shiva I gtha
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
