The High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the criminal revision case. The Appeal Court dismissed the Criminal Revision Case as withdrawn with no Opposition from the State.
Permission accorded to withdraw the criminal revision case; case dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3299 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATEOF TELANGANAAT HYbERABD
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENry SIXTHDAY OF ]ULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL EVISION CASE NO: 30 t3 0F 2(J17
Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397R/w 401 of Cr.P.C against the Order made in M.P.No.2091 of 2016 inM.C.No. 444 of2016 dated 07-10-2017 on the file of the Court of the Addl.MetropolitanSessions Judge, for the Trial of JHCBC-Cum-Family Court-Cum-Addl.Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad.
Between:
Gogikar Rakesh, S/o. G,Anand, Occ:Business, R/o.H.No.6-47, KompallY, Qutubullapur, Ranga Reddy,District.
.... RESPONDENT / REVISION PETTTTONER
AND
.... PETITIONER / RESPONDENTS
1 2 L7 RLRCMP. N 4 3 F2 1
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to stay the operation of the Order dated 07-10-2017 in M.P.No.2O9l of 2016 in M.C.No.444 of 2016 on the file of the Court of the Addl. Metropolitan Session Judge, for the Trial of IHCBC-Cum-Family Court-Cum-Addl. Metropolitan Sessions -1udge, Hyderabad.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BANKATLAL MANDHANI
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI ATIKAM SRINMS GOUD
The Cburt made the following: ORDER
HONO TRABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
CRIMIN.AL REVISION CASE No.3O13 of 2OL7
ORDER:
This Criminal Revision Case is filed toset asi<le theorder dated 07.10.2O17 it M.P.No.209 1 of 2016 inM.C.No.444of 2016 passed by the learneclAdditional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, for the Trial ol.IHCBC-Cum-FamilyCourt-Cum- Additional Metrol>olitanSession s Judge, Hyderabad.
Miscellaneotts petitions, if any, pending inthis criminal revision case, shall also stancl closed.
Sdl-I.NAGALAKSHMI DEPUTY REGISTRAR / /TRUE COPYI I (fu
SECTION OFFICER
To,
6 5. Two CD copies.
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:26 /07 /2023
ORDER
CRLRC.No.3O13 of 2OL7
.a=
,: ..t
/'..,.
1.-
],'.)
C) |
|: !J i1
1j
d.?
F.
, 1,.
i t,Jr
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN
@q8W
Gogikar Rakesh
Gogikar Swetha
Public Prosecutor, High Court of Hyderabad
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
