The High Court dismissed a criminal revision filed by a husband challenging a Family Court order granting monthly maintenance to his wife and daughter. The Court found no infirmity in the order regarding the husband's alleged cruelty.
Criminal Revision Case dismissed. Pending miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3251 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINA L REVISION CASE NO: 2430 0F 18
criminal Revision case fired under Sections 3g7 & 401 of cr.p.c., against the orders dated 09.07.2018 in M.c.No. 1g1 0f 2014 0n the fire of the XVr Additiona.r District and Sessions Judge court cum XVr Additionar Metroporitan sessions Judge court cum ilr Additionar Famiry court, Ranga Reddy District at Markajgiri.
Between:
Sirugumalle Prakash @ Adla prakash, S/o. Late B. Danaiah, Aged About.34 Years Occ: private Service R/o. H.No. 2_30, euppatguOa Village Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District.
...REVISION PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
fA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under section 492 0f cr.p.c praying that in the circumslances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay the orders dated 09.07.2018 in M.c.No.1g1 0f 20,r40n the fire of
the XVI Additror ar District and sessions Judge court curn XVr Additionar Metropolitan Ses;i.ns Judge court cum fl Additionar I:amiry court, Ranga Reddy District at llalkajgiri, thereby directing to proceed wi - th,: case.
Counsel for the P rtitioner : Sri A. MAHESH KUMAR
Counsel for Respr nCent No.1 : pUBLIC PROSECLTTOR
Counsel for Resp< nrlent No.2 : Sri SRINIVAS RAO pUTt_LrRl
Counsel for Respc ndent No.3 : None appeared
The Court made th: lollowing: ORDER
)
i I I
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEK.SURENDER
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.243O OF 2018
ORDER:
1 . There was no representation on behalf of the both the parties continuously.
')
Famil], Cor rt.. I do r-rot find any infirmit; u'itlr ,he ordcr of
the k:zrrnec Ii amily Court in granting maintt:rLz:- ce.
Miscellanr:c u:; applications pending, if anr,, r,,ha[1 sl and
closcd
Sd/- CF./EIIKATESWARLU t)HPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
-ltr
IiEC:TION OFFICER
To,
Njb
\
HIGH COUF T
DATED: l3tATeOZ3
ORDER
CRLRC.No.24i0 of 2018
.a ':a=:-:'
,,. S re oA
,4."-
/.<" <br>/: I
lr ) [u$ 2['8 !
!)
[9
,'/. '
l.i
DISMISSING THE CRL RC.
G )
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Revision maintainable was allowing the husband to question the grant of maintenance to his wife and daughter.
Whether there was any infirmity in the Family Court order granting maintenance.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Sirugumalle Prakash @ Adla prakash
The State of Telangana
B. Muthyapu Rani
Niveditha
K. Surender
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
